Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual vs Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141HP manual

Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203, model available from 2000 to 2008.
It has 1.8 (C 160) 122HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 2.0 i 16V 141HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141HP manual
Mercedes

11 reasons for Mercedes Klasa C W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122KM manual in comparison to Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8 > 8.3 l
The Mercedes C-Class W203 burns up 4 % fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not significant. At the same time during a longer period of time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.4 > 12.3 s
A small difference at the level of 7 % suggests that the Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio is insignificantly beaten here. In the „middle” segment, to which the Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 9.9 s and is by 2.4 s faster than acceleration of Chrysler’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

205 > 200 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual is greater in relation to this of the Chrysler Sebring II by 5 kilometers/hour, which allows the Mercedes to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 5 kilometers/hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
19

Range

775 > 774 km
15

Wheelbase

2,705 > 2,686 mm
Mercedes C-Class W203 has 19 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to the Chrysler Sebring II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 have a higher gear count compared with the Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio which means that Mercedes will achieve better speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not even observe the difference.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2006
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %

Chrysler

10 reasons for Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141KM manual in comparison to Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

141 > 122 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that majority of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141HP manual that has by 19 horsepower more in comparison to the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual, which makes this vehicle slightly quicker. Because of more horsepower the Chrysler should as well give slightly better efficiency in specific gears.
56

Urban consumption

11 > 11.4 l
The Chrysler uses 0.4 l less petrol while driving inside city in comparison to the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual. The Chrysler Sebring II, which comes from middle segment, consumes 0.4 l less petrol. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the urban for the mid-size segment equals to 10.6 l, while the Chrysler Sebring II consumes by 4 % more fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

319 > 312 l
The trunk of the Chrysler Sebring II is only 2 % bigger than the Mercedes. However, the difference is not significant and it would be fair to say that both cars have similar trunk capacity.
22

Width

1,760 > 1,724 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141HP manual is widther by 2 percent than the Mercedes C-Class W203 and is not really relevant. The average for the „D” class is around 1,764 millimeters and is by 4 mm bigger than the same feature of the Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio.
19

Fuel tank

64 > 63 l
The Mercedes gives way to the Chrysler in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio is able to carry by 2 percent more fuel in comparison to the Mercedes.
12

Urban range

586 > 544 km
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,796 cc
The Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio has by 11 percent greater engine displacement in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures does not differ much.
8

Maximum load capacity

490 > 470 kg
6

Length

4,925 > 4,340 mm
The Chrysler is 585 millimeters longer in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W203. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Chrysler preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141HP manual will be better driven but the Mercedes will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
0

Payload

1,988 > 1,933 kg

Cars specifications

Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual Chrysler Sebring II Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 141HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,500 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Code name W203 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK