The horsepower of the Citroen C-Crosser is by 4 horsepowers grater in relation to the Mitsubishi. Because the difference is little this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
The Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 has 2 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander II. Even though the vast majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a car, it informs the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is insensible and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference in the amount of 11 % suggests that the Mitsubishi is insensibly beaten here. In the „small off-road 4x4” class, to which the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4 is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 2 percent faster than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s car.
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the Citroen C-Crosser is larger only by 2 millimeters in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander II and is not really relevant. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class equals to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 9 mm smaller than the width of the Citroen C-Crosser.
Model release date
The difference in release date between compared cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Citroen C-Crosser may feature more modern solutions.
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Citroen, which is by 2 % higher than the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4, is appropriate option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.