Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4

Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

7 reasons for

Citroen C-Crosser, model available from 2007 to 2012.
It has 2.2 HDI 160HP diesel engine produced from 2007 to 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander II, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP diesel engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4
Citroen

7 reasons for Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 156 hp
The horsepower of the Citroen C-Crosser is by 4 horsepowers grater in relation to the Mitsubishi. Because the difference is little this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
59

Maximal torque

380 > 378 Nm
The Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 has 2 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander II. Even though the vast majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a car, it informs the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is insensible and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.9 > 11.1 s
A little difference in the amount of 11 % suggests that the Mitsubishi is insensibly beaten here. In the „small off-road 4x4” class, to which the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4 is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 2 percent faster than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s car.
22

Width

1,806 > 1,804 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the Citroen C-Crosser is larger only by 2 millimeters in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander II and is not really relevant. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class equals to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 9 mm smaller than the width of the Citroen C-Crosser.
Add a comment
stupid it's the same body
1

Model release date

2007 > 2006
The difference in release date between compared cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Citroen C-Crosser may feature more modern solutions.
1

Height

1,713 > 1,680 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Citroen, which is by 2 % higher than the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4, is appropriate option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Front overhang

969 > 990 mm

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,995 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is worth to check a torque graph.
9

Ground clearance

175 > 173 mm
Ground clearance means the gap between the car body and the ground. As far as the two compared vehicles are concerned, it is the Mitsubishi Outlander II which has 2 millimeters higher ground clearance in relation to the Citroen C-Crosser. This is why the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4 will cope better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. However, the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the Mitsubishi.
6

Length

4,665 > 4,646 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4 is 19 mm longer when compared to the Citroen C-Crosser. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Mitsubishi Outlander II preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4 will be better driven but the Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,543 > 1,537 mm
0

Rear overhang

1,004 > 1,008 mm

Cars specifications

Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.2 DID DOHC 156HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,412 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK