The horsepower is a something that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Renault Fluence Sedan which has by 25 percent horsepower more in relation to the Citroen C-Elysee II, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. With more horsepower the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual should also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
The Renault Fluence Sedan uses 0.8 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Citroen C-Elysee II. The Renault Fluence Sedan, being palced in „compact” class uses by 2.2 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 6.8 l.
Thanks to 90 Nm more torque, the engine of the Renault distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Citroen C-Elysee II. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Citroen C-Elysee II 1.2VTi 72HP manual is relatively slower compared with the Renault Fluence. The
difference at the level of
2.9 s is
quite low and for that
reason it should
not be strongly taken into
as important when selecting the better one of compared
The trunk of the Renault Fluence Sedan is only 5 % bigger than the Citroen C-Elysee II 1.2VTi 72HP manual. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have similar boot size.
The maximum velocity of the Renault is greater in relation to the Citroen by 15 kilometers/hour, which allows the Renault to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 15 kilometers per hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range and a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced affects an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to analyze a torque graph.
Width of a vehicle directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Renault is widther by 3 percent in comparison to the Citroen and is not really important. The medium for the „lower middle” class amounts to approximately 1,703 millimeters and is by 6 % smaller than the same attribute of the Renault.
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Renault Fluence Sedan which can take by 24 % more diesel in relation to the Citroen C-Elysee II.
The Renault Fluence has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Citroen C-Elysee II 1.2VTi 72HP manual. Therefore the Renault is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
The Renault Fluence Sedan has by 22 percent greater engine displacement than the Citroen C-Elysee II 1.2VTi 72HP manual. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not vary much.
Maximum load capacity
The Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual is 4 % longer when compared to the Citroen C-Elysee II 1.2VTi 72HP manual. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Renault Fluence preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Renault Fluence will be better driven ,however, the Citroen C-Elysee II 1.2VTi 72HP manual will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference of 14 mm to the advantage of the Renault Fluence Sedan is little and should not be really noticeable.