The Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual consumes 0.3 l less in the combined cycle when compared to the Citroen. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not perceptible. At the same time in the long term it would give a substantial cost reduction.
Maximum torque of the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d is 1 newton meter bigger than the Citroen C1 Hatchback. Because of this, the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual will accelerate somewhat better and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d will burn up on average less fuel for every 100 km.
The boot of the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual is 83 percent bigger than the Citroen. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual will be a way more practical. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can hold.
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Skoda is higher in comparison to this of the Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 3 km/h is little and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached affects an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is recommended to see a torque performance graph.
distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d is larger by 1 % in relation to the Citroen C1 Hatchback and is not really important. The medium for the „minicompact cars” segment amounts to around 1,549 millimeters and is by 6 % larger than the same attribute of the Skoda Citigo.
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Skoda that can hold 1 l more fuel than the Citroen C1 Hatchback. The medium fuel tank size in the minicompact cars class, from which the Skoda comes from, is 34 liters, whereas in A class (represented by the Citroen C1) it amounts to 34 l.
Skoda Citigo has 4 % longer wheelbase than the Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
Trunk length with seats up
The Skoda has by 1 cubic centimeter bigger engine capacity than the Citroen C1. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not vary much.
The Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual is 4 percent longer than the Citroen C1. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual will be better driven but the Citroen will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
Model release date
Production of the older car began 6 years prior to Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual thus it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle is equipped with not so advanced parts used.
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Skoda Citigo, which is by 11 mm higher than the Citroen, is better pick for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.