Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual vs Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual

Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2011.
It has 1.0 60HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Citroen C1 Hatchback, model available from 2005.
It has 1.0 i 68HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual
Skoda

22 reasons for Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60KM manual in comparison to Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.4 > 4.7 l
The Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual consumes 0.3 l less in the combined cycle when compared to the Citroen. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not perceptible. At the same time in the long term it would give a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

94 > 93 Nm
Maximum torque of the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d is 1 newton meter bigger than the Citroen C1 Hatchback. Because of this, the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual will accelerate somewhat better and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d will burn up on average less fuel for every 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

251 > 137 l
The boot of the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual is 83 percent bigger than the Citroen. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual will be a way more practical. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can hold.
33

Top speed

160 > 157 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Skoda is higher in comparison to this of the Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 3 km/h is little and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,995 > 3,605 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached affects an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is recommended to see a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,641 > 1,631 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d is larger by 1 % in relation to the Citroen C1 Hatchback and is not really important. The medium for the „minicompact cars” segment amounts to around 1,549 millimeters and is by 6 % larger than the same attribute of the Skoda Citigo.
19

Range

778 > 761 km
19

Fuel tank

35 > 34 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Skoda that can hold 1 l more fuel than the Citroen C1 Hatchback. The medium fuel tank size in the minicompact cars class, from which the Skoda comes from, is 34 liters, whereas in A class (represented by the Citroen C1) it amounts to 34 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,420 > 2,333 mm
Skoda Citigo has 4 % longer wheelbase than the Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
11

Trunk length with seats up

633 > 477 mm
8

Engine capacity

1,000 > 999 cc
The Skoda has by 1 cubic centimeter bigger engine capacity than the Citroen C1. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not vary much.
6

Length

3,561 > 3,436 mm
The Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual is 4 percent longer than the Citroen C1. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual will be better driven but the Citroen will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,424 > 1,413 mm
1

Model release date

2011 > 2005
Production of the older car began 6 years prior to Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual thus it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle is equipped with not so advanced parts used.
1

Height

1,478 > 1,467 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Skoda Citigo, which is by 11 mm higher than the Citroen, is better pick for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

165 > 155 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk width

1,068 > 1,023 mm
0

Front track

1,428 > 1,405 mm
0

Front overhang

601 > 648 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

1,906 > 1,855 mm
0

Curb weight

934 > 800 kg

Citroen

5 reasons for Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68KM manual in comparison to Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

68 > 60 hp
The horsepower of the Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual is by 8 horsepowers bigger than the Skoda. While the difference is little this should not affect the car performance extensively.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.7 > 14.4 s
The Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower than the Citroen C1 Hatchback. The difference in the amount of 0.7 s is not really significant and it should not be vitally taken by you into account when buying one of compared vehicles.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Citroen C1 Hatchback is more usable and if you regularly drive with more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual generally look much cooler and for those who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Skoda Citigo might be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
0

Rear overhang

447 > 544 mm
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Skoda Citigo Hatchback 3d 1.0 60HP manual Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class A A
    Payload - 1,180 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK