Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual vs Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

13 reasons for

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2005.
It has 1.0 VVT-i 68HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Citroen C1 Hatchback, model available from 2005.
It has 1.0 i 68HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual
Toyota

13 reasons for Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68KM manual in comparison to Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.5 > 4.7 l
The Toyota burns up 0.2 l fewer in the combined cycle than the Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual. The difference in the amount of 4 percent is not significant. Nevertheless within some time it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

4.5 > 5.7 l
The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual burns up of 21 % fuel less in city traffic compared to the Citroen C1 Hatchback. The Toyota, as a representative of A segment, consumes of 2 liters of fuel for every 100 km less than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “city cars” class equals to 6.5 l of fuel for every 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

139 > 137 l
The trunk of the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d is only 2 l bigger than the Citroen C1. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk space.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.9 > 4.3 l
19

Range

778 > 761 km
19

Fuel tank

36 > 34 l
The Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual gives way to the Toyota in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual is able to store by 2 liters more fuel in relation to the Citroen.
15

Wheelbase

2,348 > 2,333 mm
Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual has 1 percent longer wheelbase than the Citroen. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
12

Urban range

778 > 636 km
11

Extra-urban range

897 > 854 km
0

Front track

1,414 > 1,405 mm
0

Front overhang

644 > 648 mm
0

Rear overhang

418 > 447 mm
0

Curb weight

804 > 800 kg

Citroen

9 reasons for Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68KM manual in comparison to Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

93 > 91 Nm
The Citroen C1 has 2 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d. Although most of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it presents the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. In this case the difference is quite small so you probably will not feel the difference.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.7 > 14.2 s
A little difference in the amount of 4 percent shows that the Toyota is the worst car of these two presented. In the „A segment, being represented by the Toyota, the average acceleration to 100km/h is 14.4 s and is by 0.2 s lower than this of Toyota car.
22

Width

1,631 > 1,619 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual is 12 mm wider than the Toyota Aygo. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
8

Engine capacity

999 > 998 cc
The Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual has by 1 cubic centimeter greater cubic capacity when compared to the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not vary much.
6

Length

3,436 > 3,416 mm
The Citroen is 1 percent longer than the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d. Long vehicles are more spacious and in most cases provide bigger trunk. While the Citroen occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who value comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual may appeal to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,413 > 1,407 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Citroen is more convenient and if you frequently travel with more than one people then it’s the format to go for. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Toyota Aygo generally look much cooler and for those who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual might be better one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,467 > 1,465 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 2 mm to the advantage of the Citroen C1 Hatchback is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

1,180 > 1,177 kg

Cars specifications

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 68HP manual Citroen C1 Hatchback 1.0 i 68HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class A A
    Payload 1,177 kg 1,180 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK