Citroen C25 2.0 85HP vs Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP

Citroen C25 2.0 85HP

Source: wikipedia.org Michiel1972 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

10 reasons for

Citroen C25, model available from 1981 to 1994.
It has 2.0 85HP petrol engine produced from 1981 to 1994.
Drive has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Daihatsu 850, model available from 1983 to 1992.
It has 0.8 31HP petrol engine produced from 1983 to 1992.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP
Citroen

10 reasons for Citroen C25 2.0 85KM in comparison to Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

85 > 31 hp
The Daihatsu significantly gives way to the Citroen in the field of amount of horses under the hood having them by 174 percent less. Consequently the engine installed in the Citroen C25 2.0 85HP ,unlike the Daihatsu 850, has relatively lots of power and impersive acceleration.
22

Width

1,970 > 1,476 mm
The Citroen is harder to make maneuvers in comparison to the Daihatsu 850 and parking may pose a challenge as well as driving through bussy streets in a jammed urban areas, however, we think that benefits such as roomy interior, better handling when cornering entails that the Citroen C25 2.0 85HP is the one that it is better to buy.
15

Wheelbase

2,933 > 2,415 mm
Citroen C25 2.0 85HP has 21 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Daihatsu 850. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

2,001 > 801 cc
Surely the Citroen C25 wins the comparison of the category of {engine capacity. The difference at the level of 150 percent in comparison to the Daihatsu 850. It is interesting that in „cargo van” class, from which the Citroen comes from, the average engine size equals 2,185 cc and the biggest engine size in this class amounts to 5,967 .
6

Length

4,759 > 3,400 mm
The Daihatsu 850 is shorter in comparison to the Daihatsu 850 by o 40 %, which makes that it is much more easier to move and turn in narrow narrow streets. In the „cargo van” segment, in which the car of Daihatsu brand is palced, the medium length is 5,054 mm and is by 1,654 millimeters longer than the length of Daihatsu 850.
4

Rear track

1,653 > 1,300 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Height

2,100 > 1,820 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 15 percent in favor of the Citroen C25 is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,682 > 1,294 mm
0

End of model sale

1994 > 1992

Daihatsu

2 reasons for Daihatsu 850 0.8 31KM in comparison to Citroen C25 2.0 85HP

Reasons for
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually is a hatchback and for that reason the Daihatsu, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat enlarging a luggage compartment, has an advantage on the four-door Citroen C25 with the hinges for the boot that opens under the rear window.
1

Model release date

1983 > 1981
Because of the fact that the Citroen C25 was launched only 2 years earlier than the Daihatsu, the gap between technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Daihatsu may have slightly more new solutions applied in it.

Cars specifications

Citroen C25 2.0 85HP Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 1981 1983
    Facelifting no no
    Class cargo van cargo van
    End of model sale 1994 1992

Compare with other cars

Citroen C25 2.0 85HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Fiat Talento 2.0 85HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Citroen C25 2.0 85HP vs Fiat Talento 2.0 85HP
Fiat Fiorino II 1.0 50HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP

Source: similarcar.com

Fiat Fiorino II 1.0 50HP vs Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP
Citroen C25 2.0 85HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Ford Transit III 2.0 84HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Citroen C25 2.0 85HP vs Ford Transit III 2.0 84HP
Peugeot J 5 2.0 75HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP

Source: similarcar.com

Peugeot J 5 2.0 75HP vs Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP
Citroen C25 2.0 85HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Peugeot J 5 2.0 75HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Citroen C25 2.0 85HP vs Peugeot J 5 2.0 75HP
Seat Inca 1.4 60HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org

Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP

Source: similarcar.com

Seat Inca 1.4 60HP manual vs Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP
Citroen C25 2.0 85HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Ford Transit IV 2.0 114HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Citroen C25 2.0 85HP vs Ford Transit IV 2.0 114HP
Volkswagen Caravelle T1 BUS 1.35 37HP

Source: similarcar.com

Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP

Source: similarcar.com

Volkswagen Caravelle T1 BUS 1.35 37HP vs Daihatsu 850 0.8 31HP
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK