The horsepower is a characteristic that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Citroen that has by 13 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Volkswagen Polo V, which makes this car slightly faster. With more horsepower the Citroen should also provide a bit more flexiblility in specific gears.
The Citroen C3 II Hatchback consumes 20 percent less amount of fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d. The difference in the amount of 20 percent will be very appreciable in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it would give a substantial cost reduction.
The Citroen uses of 1.8 l fuel less while driving inside city compared to the Volkswagen Polo V. The Citroen C3 II, which is classified in B segment, uses of 2.2 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “small cars” class equals to 7.5 l of fuel for every 100 km.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual speeds up relatively slower in relation to the Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual. The
difference in the amount of
12 percent is
quite little and it should
not be substantially taken by you into
account for choosing
one of presented
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Citroen C3 II is greater in comparison to this of the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual is 45 mm wider in relation to the Volkswagen. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual has 1 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d. As a result the Citroen C3 II Hatchback is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
Number of doors
There’s no question that the five-door Citroen is more convenient and if you frequently travel with more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Volkswagen Polo V very often look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual might be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 49 mm in favor of the Citroen C3 II Hatchback is little and does not matter much.