Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual vs Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual

Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Citroen C3 II Hatchback, model available from 2008.
It has 1.0 VTi 68HP petrol engine produced from 2013 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

7 reasons for

Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d, model available from 2009.
It has 1.2 60HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2014.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual
Citroen

12 reasons for Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68KM manual in comparison to Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

68 > 60 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Citroen that has by 13 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Volkswagen Polo V, which makes this car slightly faster. With more horsepower the Citroen should also provide a bit more flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

4.4 > 5.5 l
The Citroen C3 II Hatchback consumes 20 percent less amount of fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d. The difference in the amount of 20 percent will be very appreciable in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it would give a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

5.3 > 7.1 l
The Citroen uses of 1.8 l fuel less while driving inside city compared to the Volkswagen Polo V. The Citroen C3 II, which is classified in B segment, uses of 2.2 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “small cars” class equals to 7.5 l of fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

14.2 > 16.1 s
The Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual speeds up relatively slower in relation to the Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual. The difference in the amount of 12 percent is quite little and it should not be substantially taken by you into account for choosing one of presented vehicles.
33

Top speed

162 > 157 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Citroen C3 II is greater in comparison to this of the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4 > 4.5 l
22

Width

1,727 > 1,682 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual is 45 mm wider in relation to the Volkswagen. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,465 > 2,464 mm
The Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual has 1 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d. As a result the Citroen C3 II Hatchback is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
4

Rear track

1,467 > 1,436 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Citroen is more convenient and if you frequently travel with more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Volkswagen Polo V very often look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual might be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,524 > 1,475 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 49 mm in favor of the Citroen C3 II Hatchback is little and does not matter much.
0

Front track

1,463 > 1,443 mm

Volkswagen

7 reasons for Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60KM manual in comparison to Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

108 > 95 Nm
Maximum torque of the Volkswagen is 14 percent greater than the Citroen C3 II Hatchback. For this reason, the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual will accelerate somewhat faster and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual will use on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,995 > 3,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to see a torque performance graph.
8

Engine capacity

1,198 > 999 cc
The Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual has by 20 percent larger cubic capacity when compared to the Citroen. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

3,973 > 3,940 mm
The Volkswagen is 1 percent longer in relation to the Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Volkswagen Polo V preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Volkswagen will be better driven but the Citroen C3 II will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
1

Model release date

2009 > 2008
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Volkswagen may feature more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Curb weight

1,064 > 1,051 kg

Cars specifications

Citroen C3 II Hatchback 1.0 VTi 68HP manual Volkswagen Polo V Hatchback 3d 1.2 60HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,000 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2009
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK