Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic vs Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic

Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

18 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP ic diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso, model available from 2004.
It has 1.6 THP 150HP ic petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic
Mazda

18 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150KM automat in comparison to Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 7.5 l
The Mazda CX-5 uses 2.4 l less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Citroen C4 I. The difference at the level of 2.4 l will be significant in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long run it will bring you a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

379 > 240 Nm
Because of 139 newton meters higher torque, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Citroen C4 I. This, in turn, have positive implications for a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 10.2 l
The Mazda CX-5 consumes 41 % fewer oil in city traffic when compared to the Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso. The difference in the amount of 4.2 l is quite noticeable in daily usage of the car. Moreover, in a long term it will give you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may vary depending on your driving style
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 6.1 l
22

Width

1,843 > 1,830 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda is 13 mm wider in relation to the Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,057 > 811 km
12

Urban range

903 > 600 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,191 > 1,017 km
8

Engine capacity

2,191 > 1,599 cc
The Mazda CX-5 has 592 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity in comparison to the Citroen C4 I. The difference is notable. Consequently the Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine capacity usually means worst fuel economy.
8

Gross trailer weight

2,003 > 1,496 kg
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,539 mm
1

Model release date

2011 > 2004
Production of the older car began 7 years prior to its rival and for this reason it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle gives way to Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic because it has significantly less modern solutions .
1

Height

1,668 > 1,661 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Mazda, which is by 7 millimeters higher than the Citroen, is better choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

751 > 748 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,503 mm
0

Front overhang

950 > 994 mm
0

Curb weight

1,555 > 1,522 kg

Citroen

9 reasons for Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150KM automat in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

670 > 503 l
With more boot size the Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull one than the Mazda CX-5. If the capacity of the trunk is appeals to you, the Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso will be better choice because it is around 33 percent more spacious than the trunk of the Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic.
33

Top speed

204 > 198 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso is higher in comparison to this of the Mazda CX-5 which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 6 kilometers per hour is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,405 > 1,805 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is produced determines how fast an engine reaches its best efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the longer range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt faster.
19

Fuel tank

59 > 56 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic which can carry 3 liters more fuel compared with the Mazda CX-5. The medium fuel tank capacity in the small family cars segment, which is represented by the Citroen, amounts to 52 l, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Mazda CX-5) it amounts to 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,731 > 2,700 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic has 1 % longer wheelbase distance than Mazda. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Maximum load capacity

539 > 495 kg
6

Length

4,589 > 4,537 mm
The Citroen is 1 percent longer in relation to the Mazda CX-5. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso will be better driven but the Mazda CX-5 will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
0

Payload

2,056 > 2,050 kg
0

Rear overhang

868 > 907 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso 1.6 THP 150HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 2,003 kg 1,496 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK