Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d 1.6 16v VTi 120HP manual vs Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual

Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d 1.6 16v VTi 120HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

15 reasons for

Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 16v VTi 120HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II, model available from 2008.
It has 1.6 16V 110HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual
Citroen

15 reasons for Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d 1.6 16v VTi 120KM manual in comparison to Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

120 > 110 hp
The horsepower of the Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d is 10 hp grater than the Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual. While the difference is little it should not affect the vehicles performance extensively.
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 7.1 l
The Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d uses 11 % less in the combined cycle than the Renault. The difference at the level of 0.8 l is not perceptible. However in the long term it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

160 > 151 Nm
The Citroen has 6 percent more torque in relation to the Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual. Although most of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it presents the best how fast a vehicle acclerates. When it comes to compared cars the difference is quite small so the difference will not be much noticeable.
56

Urban consumption

9 > 9.4 l
The Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d burns up 4 percent less petrol running around the town than the Renault Megane III. The Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d, which comes from compact class, uses 0.3 l fewer gasoline. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small family cars segment equals to 8.7 l, while the Citroen consumes by 4 percent more amount of fuel than the average.
33

Top speed

193 > 190 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Citroen is higher as compared to this of the Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 2 percent is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.9 > 5.5 l
19

Range

968 > 870 km
12

Urban range

682 > 638 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,277 > 1,091 km
6

Length

4,324 > 4,310 mm
The Citroen C4 II is 14 millimeters longer in comparison to the Renault. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Citroen occurs to be better choice for families or persons who value convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Renault may appeal to city drivers because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Citroen C4 II is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual generally look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Renault Megane III might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2010 > 2008
Given that the Renault's production started only 2 years prior to the Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d 1.6 16v VTi 120HP manual, the distance in technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Citroen may feature a bit more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,488 > 1,421 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Citroen C4 II, which is by 5 percent higher than the Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual, would be appropriate option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,046 > 2,035 mm
0

Rear overhang

785 > 797 mm

Renault

8 reasons for Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110KM manual in comparison to Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d 1.6 16v VTi 120HP manual

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 10.8 s
The Renault Megane III accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 10.5 s, which is 3 % in comparison to the Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d 1.6 16v VTi 120HP manual. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into consideration when buying a vehicle.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,250 > 4,255 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine achieves its full efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower revolutions or the longer range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 59 l
In this category it is the Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II that can carry 2 l more fuel in comparison to the Citroen C4 II. The average fuel tank capacity in the lower middle class, which is represented by the Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II, is 52 liters, whereas in lower middle segment (represented by the Citroen) it amounts to 52 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,646 > 2,608 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual has 38 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Renault Megane III should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual have a higher speed count in relation to the Citroen which means that Renault Megane III should have faster speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not even feel the difference.
4

Rear track

1,547 > 1,514 mm
0

Front track

1,544 > 1,523 mm
0

Front overhang

879 > 935 mm

Cars specifications

Citroen C4 II Hatchback 5d 1.6 16v VTi 120HP manual Renault Megane III Coupe Facelifting II 1.6 16V 110HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,545 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2008
    Facelifting no yes
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK