Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual vs Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual

Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Luc106 All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Citroen C4 II Picasso, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 HDi 92HP diesel engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Dacia Logan II MCV, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 16V 75HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual
Citroen

21 reasons for Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92KM manual in comparison to Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

92 > 75 hp
The horsepower of the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual is by 17 hp grater when compared to the Dacia Logan II MCV. As the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
112

Average consumption

4.3 > 5.8 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Citroen's advantage. This vehicle burns 26 % less fuel in the mixed cycle when compared with the Dacia Logan II. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the lower middle segment, in which the Citroen C4 II Picasso is classified, equals to 6.8 l while the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual uses by 37 % less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

230 > 105 Nm
The difference at the level of 119 % is really appreciable. It stems from the fact that both cars are equipped with various types of engine. While the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual has a diesel engine, the Dacia Logan II MCV is equipped with a petrol engine.
56

Urban consumption

5 > 7.6 l
The Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual burns up 34 percent fewer oil running around the town than the Dacia Logan II. The difference in the amount of 2.6 l is quite noticeable in everyday usage of the vehicle. However, in a long run it will even give you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on your driving style
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.9 > 14.2 s
A little difference in the amount of 1.3 s suggests that the Dacia Logan II MCV is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „compact” segment, to which the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 26 % faster than acceleration of Dacia’s car.
33

Top speed

173 > 162 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual is greater than the Dacia Logan II MCV by 7, which allows the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual to travel faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 7 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 4,250 revolutions/minute
Such a huge difference results from the fact that both vehicles have various engines. The Citroen C4 II Picasso is equipped with the diesel engine whereas the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual is equipped with the petrol engine. In case of different kinds of engines, comparing this feature seems to be pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4 > 4.7 l
22

Width

1,829 > 1,729 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Citroen is 100 mm wider in comparison to the Dacia Logan II MCV. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

1,357 > 862 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 49 l
In this category it is the Citroen C4 II Picasso which can contain 14 % more fuel in comparison to the Dacia Logan II MCV. The average fuel container size in the compact class, from which the Citroen C4 II Picasso comes from, amounts to 52 l, whereas in lower middle class (represented by the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual) it amounts to 52 liters.
12

Urban range

1,188 > 658 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,500 > 1,020 km
8

Engine capacity

1,561 > 1,148 cc
The engine size of the Citroen is by 413 cc larger in comparison to the Dacia Logan II MCV. As a result the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Citroen C4 II Picasso will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
4

Rear track

1,575 > 1,476 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Height

1,609 > 1,518 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Citroen C4 II, which is by 91 mm higher than the Dacia Logan II, is better choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,574 > 1,496 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,173 > 1,998 mm
0

Rear overhang

763 > 1,046 mm

Dacia

4 reasons for Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75KM manual in comparison to Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

575 > 537 l
The trunk of the Dacia is only 38 l bigger than the Citroen C4 II. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk space.
6

Length

4,496 > 4,423 mm
The Dacia Logan II MCV is 73 mm longer when compared to the Citroen. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Dacia Logan II MCV preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Dacia Logan II MCV will be better driven but the Citroen C4 II Picasso will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2010
Because of the fact that the Citroen C4 II Picasso was introduced only 2 years before the Dacia Logan II, the distance in technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Dacia might feature a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Front overhang

815 > 879 mm

Cars specifications

Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,445 kg -
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2010 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK