The horsepower of the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual is by 17 hp grater when compared to the Dacia Logan II MCV. As the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
The fuel economy is distinctly to Citroen's advantage. This vehicle burns 26 % less fuel in the mixed cycle when compared with the Dacia Logan II. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the lower middle segment, in which the Citroen C4 II Picasso is classified, equals to 6.8 l while the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual uses by 37 % less fuel than the average.
The difference at the level of 119 % is really appreciable. It stems from the fact that both cars are equipped with various types of engine. While the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual has a diesel engine, the Dacia Logan II MCV is equipped with a petrol engine.
The Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual burns up 34 percent fewer oil running around the town than the Dacia Logan II. The difference in the amount of 2.6 l is quite noticeable in everyday usage of the vehicle. However, in a long run it will even give you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on your driving style
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference in the amount of 1.3 s suggests that the Dacia Logan II MCV is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „compact” segment, to which the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 26 % faster than acceleration of Dacia’s car.
The top velocity of the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual is greater than the Dacia Logan II MCV by 7, which allows the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual to travel faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 7 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
Such a huge difference results from the fact that both vehicles have various engines. The Citroen C4 II Picasso is equipped with the diesel engine whereas the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual is equipped with the petrol engine. In case of different kinds of engines, comparing this feature seems to be pointless.
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Citroen is 100 mm wider in comparison to the Dacia Logan II MCV. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
In this category it is the Citroen C4 II Picasso which can contain 14 % more fuel in comparison to the Dacia Logan II MCV. The average fuel container size in the compact class, from which the Citroen C4 II Picasso comes from, amounts to 52 l, whereas in lower middle class (represented by the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual) it amounts to 52 liters.
The engine size of the Citroen is by 413 cc larger in comparison to the Dacia Logan II MCV. As a result the Dacia Logan II MCV 1.2 16V 75HP manual will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Citroen C4 II Picasso will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Citroen C4 II, which is by 91 mm higher than the Dacia Logan II, is better choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.