Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual vs Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual

Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Luc106 All Rights Released into the public domain

24 reasons for

Citroen C4 II Picasso, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 HDi 92HP diesel engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d, model available from 2011.
It has 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual
Citroen

24 reasons for Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92KM manual in comparison to Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

92 > 85 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Citroen C4 II that has by 8 percent horsepower more in relation to the Kia, which makes this car a bit better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Citroen C4 II will also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

4.3 > 5.2 l
The Citroen C4 II Picasso burns up 17 % less in the combined cycle in comparison to the Kia Rio III. The difference in the amount of 17 % is not very appreciable. However during a longer period of time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

230 > 122 Nm
The Citroen C4 II has 108 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Kia. The difference at such level is relevant, so that the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual will be seeding up perceptibly faster.
56

Urban consumption

5 > 6 l
The Citroen C4 II Picasso consumes 1 liter fewer fuel in city traffic than the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual. The difference at the level of 17 percent will be quite significant in use of car. Additionally, during long period of time it may generate real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover keep in mind that estimated results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.9 > 13.1 s
A little difference at the level of 2 % indicates that the Kia is the worst car of these two . In the „small family cars segment, being represented by the Kia Rio III, the average acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 16 percent higher than this of Kia car.
38

Trunk capacity

537 > 288 l
The boot of the Citroen is 249 liters more spacious than the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Citroen C4 II will be much more useful. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.
33

Top speed

173 > 168 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Citroen C4 II Picasso is greater in comparison to the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual by 3, which allows the Citroen C4 II Picasso to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference stems from the fact that both vehicles are equipped with various engines. The Citroen C4 II Picasso is equipped with the diesel engine and the Kia has the petrol engine. As both cars have different types of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4 > 4.3 l
22

Width

1,829 > 1,720 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual is widther by 109 millimeters than the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „lower middle” class is around 1,703 millimeters and is by 7 percent larger than the same attribute of the Citroen C4 II.
19

Range

1,357 > 860 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 42 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual that is able to hold by 14 liters more oil in comparison to the Kia.
12

Urban range

1,188 > 717 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,500 > 1,000 km
8

Engine capacity

1,561 > 1,247 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Citroen C4 II is by 314 cc larger when compared to the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d. In a consequence the Kia Rio III will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Citroen will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Maximum load capacity

641 > 531 kg
6

Length

4,423 > 4,045 mm
The Citroen C4 II Picasso is 378 millimeters longer in comparison to the Kia. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Citroen C4 II seems to be better option for families or those who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual may appeal to singles because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,575 > 1,525 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Citroen C4 II Picasso is more convenient and if you regularly carry more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual very often look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d might be more appropriate.
1

Height

1,609 > 1,453 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference of 156 mm to the advantage of the Citroen C4 II is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,920 > 1,560 kg
0

Front track

1,574 > 1,508 mm
0

Curb weight

1,279 > 1,030 kg

Kia

3 reasons for Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85KM manual in comparison to Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual

Reasons for
1

Model release date

2011 > 2010
Because of the fact that the Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual was launched only 1 year prior to the Kia, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual may feature a bit more new solutions applied in it.
0

Front overhang

806 > 879 mm
0

Rear overhang

670 > 763 mm

Cars specifications

Citroen C4 II Picasso 1.6 HDi 92HP manual Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,445 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK