Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual vs Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual

Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias93 All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Ford Mondeo III Hatchback, model available from 1999 to 2007.
It has 1.8 16V 110HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Citroen C5 I Hatchback, model available from 2000 to 2004.
It has 1.8i 16V 116HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual
Ford

17 reasons for Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.6 > 7.8 l
The Ford Mondeo III Hatchback consumes 3 % less fuel in the mixed cycle than the Citroen C5 I Hatchback. The Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual, which is classified in „mid-size” class burns up by 0.1 l less of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.7 l.
59

Maximal torque

165 > 160 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford Mondeo III is 5 newton meters greater than the Citroen C5 I Hatchback. For this reason, the Ford will accelerate slightly better and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Ford will consume fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.7 > 12.1 s
A little difference in the amount of 3 % indicates that the Citroen C5 I Hatchback is the worst car of these two compared. In the „D segment, being represented by the Citroen C5 I, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 9.9 s and is by 2.2 s higher than this of Citroen car.
38

Trunk capacity

500 > 456 l
If you are looking for a car for long travels, which could room more things in the boot , take the Ford Mondeo III. The Citroen C5 I Hatchback is equiped with by 10 percent less capable boot in comparison to the Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual so you would be able to put in the trunk a bit less. When it comes to the luggage compartment also check its width length and height which have notable impact on loading possibility .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,369 > 1,312 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,950 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. Still, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always recommended to check a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 6.2 l
22

Width

1,813 > 1,766 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Ford Mondeo III Hatchback is widther by 3 percent than the Citroen and is not really important. The average for the „D” class is 1,764 mm and is by 49 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Ford Mondeo III.
8

Engine capacity

1,799 > 1,750 cc
The Ford Mondeo III has by 3 % greater engine capacity in comparison to the Citroen C5 I. This may have a little impact when it comes to car's performance, as both figures are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,731 > 4,618 mm
The Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual is 113 millimeters longer when compared to the Citroen C5 I. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Ford Mondeo III Hatchback probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback will be better driven but the Citroen C5 I will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,540 > 1,493 mm
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Payload

1,860 > 1,806 kg
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2004
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,387 > 1,286 kg

Citroen

12 reasons for Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116KM manual in comparison to Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

116 > 110 hp
The horsepower of the Citroen C5 I is 6 hp grater in comparison to the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual. As the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance extensively.
56

Urban consumption

10.8 > 11.2 l
The Citroen C5 I uses 0.4 l fewer fuel in city traffic in comparison to the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual. The Citroen, which comes from large family cars segment, uses 0.2 l fewer gasoline. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the mid-size segment is 10.6 l, while the Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual uses by 2 percent more fuel than the average.
33

Top speed

196 > 193 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual is greater than of the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback by 3 kilometers per hour, which allows the Citroen to overcome quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 2 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
19

Range

857 > 776 km
19

Fuel tank

65 > 58 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the category of fuel tank size is Citroen C5 I Hatchback which is able to carry by 12 % more petrol in comparison to the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback.
15

Wheelbase

2,756 > 2,754 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual has 2 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Ford Mondeo III Hatchback. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

623 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,100 > 1,054 km
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 481 kg
1

Model release date

2000 > 1999
The difference in debut day between compared cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Citroen C5 I Hatchback may have more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,477 > 1,427 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Citroen C5 I, which is by 4 percent higher than the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual, would be better choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Front track

1,528 > 1,520 mm

Cars specifications

Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,800 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK