Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual vs Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual

Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203, model available from 2000 to 2008.
It has 1.8 (C 160) 122HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

17 reasons for

Citroen C5 I Hatchback, model available from 2000 to 2004.
It has 1.8i 16V 116HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual
Mercedes

19 reasons for Mercedes Klasa C W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

122 > 116 hp
The horsepower of the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual is 6 horsepowers bigger in comparison to the Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual. As the difference is little it should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
59

Maximal torque

192 > 160 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mercedes C-Class W203 is 32 Nm bigger than the Citroen C5 I. Because of this, the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual will consume on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.4 > 12.1 s
A small difference at the level of 6 % suggests that the Citroen C5 I Hatchback is slightly beaten here. In the „large family cars” segment, to which the Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration is 9.9 s and is by 2.2 s faster than acceleration of Citroen’s car.
33

Top speed

205 > 196 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Mercedes is greater in relation to of the Citroen C5 I by 5, which allows the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 kilometers per hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly indicates that the winner is is the one of the Mercedes C-Class W203. The engine of the Citroen C5 I Hatchback reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 63 percent worst result than the Mercedes.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.9 > 6.2 l
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mercedes have a higher gear count compared to the Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual which means that Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual should have better acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not even feel the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,796 > 1,750 cc
The Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual has 3 percent greater engine size in relation to the Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual. As the difference is small, the Mercedes C-Class W203 should accelerate only slightly faster, of course assuming that other paramerters are equal.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Rim width

7 > 6 mm
0

Payload

1,933 > 1,806 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

730 > 676 kg
0

Rim diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2004
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,460 > 1,286 kg

Citroen

17 reasons for Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116KM manual in comparison to Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.8 > 8 l
The Citroen C5 I uses 3 percent less in the combined cycle in comparison to the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203. The difference in the amount of 3 percent is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless in the long term it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

10.8 > 11.4 l
The Citroen C5 I burns up 5 % fewer petrol in city traffic than the Mercedes C-Class W203. The Citroen, which represents large family cars class, burns up 0.2 l less gasoline. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the D class equals to 10.6 l, whereas the Citroen C5 I consumes by 2 percent more fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 312 l
With more luggage capacity the Citroen will have much more room for loading things and be more functional car compared with the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203. If the capacity of the boot is important to you, the Citroen will be better to buy because it is around 144 liters more spacious than the boot of its competitor.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,312 > 1,098 l
22

Width

1,766 > 1,724 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual is widther by 2 % in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W203 and is not really relevant. The average for the „D” segment amounts to approximately 1,764 mm and is by 2 mm larger than the same feature of the Citroen C5 I Hatchback.
19

Range

857 > 775 km
19

Fuel tank

65 > 63 l
The Mercedes gives way to the Citroen C5 I Hatchback in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Citroen C5 I Hatchback is able to store by 2 l more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,756 > 2,705 mm
The Citroen C5 I has 51 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Mercedes. Therefore the Citroen C5 I is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

623 > 544 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,100 > 1,016 km
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 470 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

1,800 > 1,500 kg
6

Length

4,618 > 4,340 mm
The Citroen C5 I is 6 percent longer in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W203. Long cars are more spacious and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Citroen occurs to be better option for families or those who appreciate comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mercedes C-Class W203 may appeal to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,493 > 1,463 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
Much more comfortable and practical vehicle is 5-door Citroen C5 I Hatchback. The 2-door Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 offers little advantages, except for sporty design.
1

Height

1,477 > 1,398 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Citroen, which is by 6 % higher than the Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual, would be better choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Front track

1,528 > 1,493 mm

Cars specifications

Mercedes C-Class W203 Coupe W203 1.8 (C 160) 122HP manual Citroen C5 I Hatchback 1.8i 16V 116HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,500 kg 1,800 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Code name W203 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK