Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic vs Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual

Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Source: similarcar.com All rights reserved

30 reasons for

Citroen C5 II Hatchback, model available from 2004 to 2008.
It has 2.0 HDi 136HP ic diesel engine produced from 2004 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

1 reason for

Ford Mondeo II Hatchback, model available from 1993 to 2001.
It has 1.6 16V 95HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual
Citroen

30 reasons for Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136KM automat in comparison to Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

136 > 95 hp
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback has by 41 horsepowers more horsepower compared to Ford Mondeo II Hatchback. The Citroen will be distinctly quicker accelerate because of grater horsepower. Also overtaking obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be a piece of cake for the Citroen C5 II equipped with stronger engine.
112

Average consumption

7.2 > 7.8 l
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback burns up 8 % fewer in the combined cycle when compared to the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback. The difference in the amount of 8 percent is not perceptible. At the same time in the long term it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

320 > 142 Nm
When you push the gas and you start speeding up quickly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will notice it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Citroen because it has by 178 newton meters more torque in relation to the Ford. Compared cars differ so much that only driving the Citroen C5 II you will experience a pleasurable sensations of getting pressed back in the seat when the car begins to accelerate.
56

Urban consumption

10 > 11.1 l
The fuel consumption of the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is 10 % better in comparison to the Ford. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long run it may make that the vehicle would be significantly cheper to utilize.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 448 l
The trunk of the Citroen C5 II Hatchback is only 2 percent bigger than the Ford Mondeo II. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have similar trunk capacity.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,308 > 964 l
33

Top speed

204 > 185 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is greater than the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback by 10, which allows the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 19 kilometers/hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 3,500 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is reached tells us how fast an engine achieves its full output with growth in revolutions. The lower revolutions or the longer range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.7 > 6 l
22

Width

1,785 > 1,749 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Citroen C5 II Hatchback is 2 % wider in relation to the Ford. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

930 > 782 km
19

Fuel tank

65 > 60 l
The Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual gives way to the Citroen C5 II Hatchback in the field of fuel tank size. The Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is able to hold by 5 liters more fuel than its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,754 > 2,708 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic has 2 % longer wheelbase distance than Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Citroen should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

673 > 560 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,200 > 1,017 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Citroen have a higher gear count than the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback which means that Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic will achieve better speeding up and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,599 cc
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback has 399 cubic centimeters larger engine displacement in comparison to the Ford Mondeo II. Because the difference is not big, the Citroen C5 II should accelerate only a bit dynamically, assuming that other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,745 > 4,481 mm
The Citroen C5 II is 264 mm longer than the Ford Mondeo II. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Citroen will be better driven ,however, the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,493 > 1,484 mm
1

Model release date

2004 > 1993
Manufacture of the older car commenced 11 years prior to Ford Mondeo II Hatchback thus man may suspect that this vehicle features not so advanced solutions applied.
1

Tire width

215 > 185 mm
1

Height

1,467 > 1,424 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Citroen C5 II, which is by 3 percent higher than the Ford Mondeo II, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a comfortable drive around town, it is good to have an automatic but the type of transmisison may have a considerable impact on fuel economy. Automatics may use about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,250 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,069 > 1,801 kg
0

Front track

1,528 > 1,503 mm
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2001
0

Tire diameter

16 > 14 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,557 > 1,242 kg

Ford

1 reason for Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Reasons for
8

Maximum load capacity

565 > 520 kg

Cars specifications

Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,202 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 1993
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK