The Citroen comes with diesel which makes by 70 percent more horsepower over the the engine of the Honda Accord I Hatchback 1.6 EX (SJ) 80HP manual, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It seems to be googd option to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
The fuel economy is distinctly to Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic's advantage. This automobile uses 2 l less diesel in the mixed cycle than the Honda Accord I Hatchback 1.6 EX (SJ) 80HP manual. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the middle segment, in which the Citroen C5 II is classified, is 7.7 l whereas the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic consumes by 7 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
The difference of 193 Nm is really large. It is a consequence of the fact that these vehicles have various types of engine. While the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic has a diesel engine, the Honda has a petrol engine.
The Honda Accord I has by 46 kilometers per hour smaller top speed in comparison to the Citroen C5 II Hatchback, because of which traveling a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will last much longer. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on on the road without speed limits to the vehicle of Citroen brand advantage.
Maximal torque RPM
The RMP where the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the longer range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Citroen C5 II Hatchback is 170 millimeters wider than the Honda Accord I Hatchback. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
Citroen C5 II has 374 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to the Honda Accord I Hatchback 1.6 EX (SJ) 80HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback has by 395 cc greater engine size than the Honda Accord I Hatchback 1.6 EX (SJ) 80HP manual. This may have a little impact in terms of acceleration, as both values are quite simmilar.
The Citroen C5 II is 15 % longer when compared to the Honda Accord I. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually have more storage space. While the Citroen occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Honda Accord I Hatchback 1.6 EX (SJ) 80HP manual may be more appropriate to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
Number of doors
There’s no question that the five-door Citroen is more convenient and if you regularly travel with more than one people then it’s the format to go for. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Honda very often look much cooler and for those who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Honda Accord I Hatchback 1.6 EX (SJ) 80HP manual might be more appropriate.
Model release date
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Citroen, which is by 10 percent higher than the Honda Accord I Hatchback 1.6 EX (SJ) 80HP manual, would be better pick for you. However, compared cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
To drivers who prefer less absorbing driving a car and don’t need complications resulting from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic transmission. To those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.