Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic vs Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual

Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Source: similarcar.com All rights reserved

13 reasons for

Citroen C5 II Hatchback, model available from 2004 to 2008.
It has 2.0 HDi 136HP ic diesel engine produced from 2004 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mazda 6 II Hatchback, model available from 2007 to 2012.
It has 1.8 MZR 120HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual
Citroen

13 reasons for Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136KM automat in comparison to Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

136 > 120 hp
The horsepower of the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is by 16 hp grater when compared to the Mazda. As the difference is little it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
33

Top speed

204 > 200 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Citroen C5 II is greater than this of the Mazda 6 II Hatchback by 2, which allows the Citroen to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 4 kilometers per hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,785 > 1,780 mm
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin as well as stability while driving. The width of the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is larger only by 5 millimeters in comparison to the Mazda and is not really relevant. The average for the „mid-size” segment is around 1,764 mm and is by 21 millimeters smaller than the width of the Citroen C5 II.
19

Fuel tank

65 > 64 l
In this category it is the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic that can contain 1 l more fuel than the Mazda 6 II. The average fuel container size in the D class, from which the Citroen C5 II comes from, equals 63 liters, whereas in mid-size segment (represented by the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual) it amounts to 63 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,754 > 2,685 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Citroen has 69 mm longer wheelbase distance than Mazda 6 II Hatchback. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Citroen C5 II should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback has only one additional speed in comparison to the Mazda. Generally this extra speed is a taller one so that the previous gears can be shorter in order to allow better performance in the lower speeds. One more speed as well will contribute to smaller fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,798 cc
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic has by 11 percent bigger engine size when compared to the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual. This may have a little impact in terms of acceleration, as both figures does not vary much.
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 490 kg
6

Length

4,745 > 4,687 mm
The Citroen is 58 millimeters longer when compared to the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual. Long vehicles are more spacious and also provide more storage space. Although the Citroen seems to be better option for families or those who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual may appeal to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,467 > 1,434 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 33 millimeters to the advantage of the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is little and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is installed in the Citroen despite having a few minuses gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be more relaxed. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Payload

2,069 > 1,886 kg
0

Curb weight

1,557 > 1,400 kg

Mazda

9 reasons for Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 7.2 l
The Mazda burns up 8 % less in the mixed cycle in relation to the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic. The difference at the level of 0.6 l is not perceptible. However within some time it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
38

Trunk capacity

510 > 456 l
The boot of the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual is only 54 l bigger than the Citroen. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar boot size.
19

Range

941 > 930 km
4

Rear track

1,539 > 1,493 mm
1

Model release date

2007 > 2004
Given that the Citroen C5 II Hatchback was introduced only 3 years prior to the Mazda, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Mazda may have a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Front track

1,539 > 1,528 mm
0

End of model sale

2012 > 2008
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

50 > 55 %

Cars specifications

Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,202 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK