Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual vs Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP diesel engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Citroen C5 II Hatchback, model available from 2004 to 2008.
It has 2.0 HDi 136HP ic diesel engine produced from 2004 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic
Mercedes

22 reasons for Mercedes Klasa C W204 Kombi T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.4 > 7.2 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Mercedes C-Class W204's advantage. This car uses 1.8 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Citroen. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the mid-size class, in which the Mercedes is classified, equals to 7.7 l whereas the Mercedes burns up by 30 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

362 > 320 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting is 13 % higher than the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic. Because of this, the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting will use on average less fuel per 100 kilometers.
54

Urban consumption

6.4 > 10 l
The Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual burns up 3.6 l fewer fuel in city traffic than the Citroen C5 II Hatchback. The difference at the level of 36 percent will be very big in use of vehicle. Additionally, within long period of time it will generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also note that medium results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably raised if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
36

Trunk capacity

485 > 456 l
The trunk of the Mercedes is only 29 l bigger than the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both cars have similar boot capacity.
32

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,500 > 1,308 l
29

Maximal torque RPM

1,595 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered affects an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always good to see a torque performance graph.
28

Top speed

209 > 204 km/h
The maximum speed of the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting is greater in comparison to this of the Citroen C5 II Hatchback which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 2 % is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
23

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 5.7 l
16

Wheelbase

2,759 > 2,754 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual has 5 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Citroen. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
10

Trunk length with seats up

1,038 > 1,001 mm
7

Maximum load capacity

540 > 520 kg
7

Gross trailer weight

1,804 > 1,202 kg
4

Engine capacity

2,143 > 1,998 cc
The Mercedes C-Class W204 has by 7 % greater engine capacity in comparison to the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values are quite simmilar.
3

Rear track

1,544 > 1,493 mm
2

Model release date

2006 > 2004
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace and for that reason the Mercedes may feature more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
2

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Trunk length with seats down

1,802 > 1,712 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

2,800 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,155 > 2,069 kg
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,528 mm
0

Front overhang

773 > 1,034 mm
0

Curb weight

1,616 > 1,557 kg

Citroen

6 reasons for Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136KM automat in comparison to Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual

Reasons for
20

Width

1,785 > 1,774 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Citroen is 1 % wider in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
9

Length

4,745 > 4,606 mm
The Citroen C5 II is 139 millimeters longer in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting. Long cars are more spacious and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Citroen C5 II seems to be better for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mercedes C-Class W204 may be more appropriate to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
2

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
2

Height

1,467 > 1,459 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 8 millimeters in favor of the Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a smooth drive around town, it is worth to have an automatic however the type of transmisison may have a substantial impact on fuel efficiency. Automatics may burn up about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Rear overhang

961 > 1,069 mm

Cars specifications

Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 1,804 kg 1,202 kg
    Model release date 2006 2004
    Price range luxury popular
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name W204 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK