The Citroen has by 61 hp more horsepower compared to Toyota Carina III Hatchback. The Citroen C5 II Hatchback will be distinctly more dynamically accelerate owing to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also passing obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be much more easier for a car equipped with stronger motor.
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Citroen is 6 % wider in relation to the Toyota Carina III Hatchback. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Toyota Carina III Hatchback loses with the Citroen C5 II Hatchback in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic is able to take by 3 l more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
The Citroen C5 II Hatchback 2.0 HDi 136HP automatic has 9 % longer wheelbase when compared to Toyota Carina III. Thanks to this the Citroen C5 II Hatchback is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
The Citroen is 367 millimeters longer in comparison to the Toyota Carina III Hatchback 1.6 75HP. Long vehicles are more spacious and in most cases have more storage space. While the Citroen C5 II seems to be better option for families or persons who value convenient rides, the Toyota Carina III Hatchback may appeal to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
Model release date
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 7 percent in favor of the Citroen is not big and should not be really noticeable.
For a comfortable travelling in the city, it is good to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison can have a considerable effect on fuel consumption. Automatics may burn up about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.