Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual vs Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

19 reasons for

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer, model available from 2007.
It has 2.0 HDi 163HP diesel engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Kia Optima Sedan, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 DOHC 165HP petrol engine produced from 2013 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual
Citroen

19 reasons for Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163KM manual in comparison to Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.2 > 7.2 l
The Citroen C5 III consumes 28 % less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual. The difference at the level of 2 liters will be quite very appreciable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long term it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

340 > 197 Nm
Due to 73 percent greater torque, the engine of the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Kia. This, in turn, have positive implications for a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 9.3 l
The Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual uses 2.5 l fewer fuel in the city in relation to the Kia Optima. The difference at the level of 2.5 l is very significant in use of car. Additionally, within years it will give gigantic cost savings. Moreover note that medium results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.3 > 9.5 s
A small difference in the amount of 0.2 s shows that the Kia Optima Sedan is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „large family cars class, being represented by the Kia, the medium acceleration amounts to 9.9 s and is by 0.4 s lower than this of Kia vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

533 > 505 l
The boot of the Citroen C5 III is only 6 percent bigger than the Kia. However, the difference is not significant and it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same boot capacity.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,795 revolutions/minute
This big difference results from the fact that both compared vehicles are equipped with different engines. The Citroen has the diesel engine while the Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual has the petrol engine. In case of different kinds of engines, comparing this feature seems to be pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 5.6 l
22

Width

1,860 > 1,834 mm
Width of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The Citroen C5 III is widther by 26 mm than the Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual and is not really relevant. The average for the „D” class amounts to approximately 1,764 millimeters and is by 5 percent larger than the same feature of the Citroen.
19

Range

1,392 > 1,000 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 69 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Citroen C5 III that can hold 1 l more fuel in comparison to the Kia Optima. The average fuel container capacity in the mid-size class, which is represented by the Citroen C5 III, amounts to 63 l, whereas in D segment (represented by the Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual) it amounts to 63 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,809 > 2,796 mm
The Citroen has 13 mm longer wheelbase than Kia Optima Sedan. As a result the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

1,076 > 753 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,651 > 1,250 km
8

Maximum load capacity

643 > 579 kg
1

Height

1,483 > 1,457 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars of 26 mm in favor of the Citroen is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

3,750 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,238 > 2,000 kg
0

Rear overhang

962 > 1,086 mm
0

Curb weight

1,595 > 1,425 kg

Kia

6 reasons for Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 163 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual that has by 2 horsepower more when compared to the Citroen C5 III, which makes this car somewhat quicker. Having more horsepower the Kia should as well provide somewhat more flexiblility in specific speeds.
6

Length

4,847 > 4,830 mm
The Kia Optima Sedan is 17 millimeters longer in relation to the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer. Long cars have more interior space and also provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual seems to be better choice for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer may appeal to women as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,560 mm
1

Model release date

2011 > 2007
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Kia may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Front track

1,588 > 1,586 mm
0

Front overhang

963 > 1,054 mm

Cars specifications

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,300 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK