Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual vs Renault Laguna III Hatchback 2.0 16v dCi 180HP manual

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

21 reasons for

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer, model available from 2007.
It has 2.0 HDi 163HP diesel engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Renault Laguna III Hatchback, model available from 2007.
It has 2.0 16v dCi 180HP diesel engine produced from 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Renault Laguna III Hatchback 2.0 16v dCi 180HP manual
Citroen

21 reasons for Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163KM manual in comparison to Renault Laguna III Hatchback 2.0 16v dCi 180HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.2 > 6.7 l
The Citroen C5 III burns up 22 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Renault Laguna III. The difference in the amount of 22 percent will be quite realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long term it will result in a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 8.6 l
The Citroen C5 III burns up of 1.8 l oil less while driving inside city than the Renault Laguna III. The Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual, as a representative of middle class, uses 3.8 l per 100 km fewer than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “D” segment equals to 10.6 l/100Km.
38

Trunk capacity

533 > 452 l
The Citroen C5 III Crosstourer features 81 l bigger boot compared with the Renault. Such a difference is big therefore it will affect the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Citroen has 16 percent bigger boot size than the average in its class. Bigger trunk will be useful during family journeys and also while daily car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,491 > 1,379 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 5.5 l
22

Width

1,860 > 1,811 mm
Width of a car directly affects interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The width of the Citroen is larger by 49 mm in comparison to the Renault Laguna III Hatchback and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large family cars” segment amounts to approximately 1,764 millimeters and is by 96 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual.
19

Range

1,392 > 1,015 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 67 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank capacity is Citroen which can carry by 3 l more oil compared with the Renault Laguna III Hatchback.
15

Wheelbase

2,809 > 2,760 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual has 2 percent longer wheelbase distance when compared to Renault Laguna III Hatchback. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Citroen should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

1,076 > 767 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,651 > 1,200 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,996 cc
The Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual has 2 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity in relation to the Renault. As the difference is small, the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer should accelerate only a bit better, of course if other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

643 > 550 kg
6

Length

4,830 > 4,695 mm
The Citroen C5 III is 135 millimeters longer in comparison to the Renault Laguna III. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have bigger trunk. Although the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who appreciate convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Renault Laguna III Hatchback 2.0 16v dCi 180HP manual may appeal to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,560 > 1,509 mm
1

Height

1,483 > 1,445 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 3 % to the advantage of the Citroen C5 III is not big and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Payload

2,238 > 2,084 kg
0

Front track

1,586 > 1,559 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,096 > 2,065 mm
0

Curb weight

1,595 > 1,534 kg

Renault

8 reasons for Renault Laguna III Hatchback 2.0 16v dCi 180KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 163 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Renault Laguna III Hatchback that has by 10 % horsepower more in relation to the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual, which makes this car somewhat better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Renault Laguna III Hatchback should as well give a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

400 > 340 Nm
Maximum torque of the Renault Laguna III Hatchback is 18 percent bigger than the Citroen C5 III. As a result, the Renault will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Renault Laguna III will burn up fever fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.5 > 9.3 s
The Citroen C5 III accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in relation to the Renault Laguna III. The difference at the level of 0.8 s is quite little and it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration for choosing one of presented cars.
33

Top speed

222 > 210 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Renault is higher as compared to this of the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 12 kilometers per hour is not big and is not realy noticable in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,000 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s performance. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to analyze a torque graph.
0

Front overhang

1,014 > 1,054 mm
0

Rear overhang

928 > 962 mm
0

Tire profile

50 > 55 %

Cars specifications

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual Renault Laguna III Hatchback 2.0 16v dCi 180HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,505 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK