Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145HP manual vs Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual

Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias93 All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Ford S-Max Van, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 i 16V 145HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Citroen C8, model available from 2002.
It has 2.0 i 16V 138HP petrol engine produced from 2002.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual
Ford

15 reasons for Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145KM manual in comparison to Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

145 > 138 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford S-Max which has by 7 horsepower more in comparison to the Citroen C8, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the Ford should also provide a bit more flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

8.1 > 9.2 l
The Ford S-Max Van consumes 1.1 l less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Citroen C8. The difference at the level of 1.1 l is not very appreciable. At the same time in the long term it would give a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

11.2 > 12.5 l
The Ford S-Max consumes 10 percent less in the city when compared to the Citroen C8. The difference at the level of 1.3 l is not very appreciable in daily usage of the car, however, within a several months it would allow you to make a real savings.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.9 > 12.2 s
A little difference at the level of 11 % indicates that the Citroen is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „van class, being represented by the Citroen C8, the average acceleration to 100km/h is 12.6 s and is by 3 % lower than this of Citroen vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

283 > 227 l
With more trunk space the Ford will have much more room for loading things and be more functional car than the Citroen. If the size of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Ford S-Max Van will be better choice as it is around 25 percent larger than the boot of its contender.
33

Top speed

197 > 185 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Ford is higher in comparison to this of the Citroen which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 12 km/h is not big and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
22

Width

1,883 > 1,849 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Ford is 2 percent wider in comparison to the Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,858 > 2,831 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145HP manual has 27 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Citroen C8. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,000 > 1,998 cc
The Ford S-Max has 2 cc bigger cubic capacity in comparison to the Citroen C8. As the difference is not big, the Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145HP manual should accelerate only slightly dynamically, if other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,768 > 4,721 mm
The Ford S-Max Van is 47 mm longer than the Citroen C8. Long cars more of passenger space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Ford S-Max occurs to be better option for families or persons who value convenient rides, the Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Model release date

2006 > 2002
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Ford may have more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Rim diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire diameter

17 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

50 > 65 %

Citroen

8 reasons for Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138KM manual in comparison to Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,949 > 2,100 l
19

Range

879 > 864 km
19

Fuel tank

79 > 69 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Citroen which can contain 10 liters more fuel in relation to the Ford. The average fuel container capacity in the van segment, from which the Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual comes from, equals 70 l, whereas in van segment (represented by the Ford S-Max Van) it amounts to 70 l.
12

Urban range

650 > 636 km
8

Maximum load capacity

735 > 578 kg
1

Height

1,752 > 1,660 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Citroen, which is by 6 percent higher than the Ford S-Max Van, would be better choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Payload

2,385 > 2,180 kg
0

Curb weight

1,642 > 1,605 kg

Cars specifications

Ford S-Max Van 2.0 i 16V 145HP manual Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 2,180 kg 2,385 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK