The Peugeot 807 burns up 1 percent less in the combined cycle in comparison to the Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual. The difference at the level of 0.1 l is not significant. Nevertheless in the long run it would give a real savings.
The fuel consumption of the Peugeot 807 Minivan 2.0 16V 136HP manual is 0.2 l smaller than the Citroen C8. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it may cause that the car would be noticably cheper to utilize.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Peugeot is 1 mm wider in relation to the Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Citroen gives way to the Peugeot in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Peugeot is able to carry by 2 liters more fuel in relation to its competitor.
The Peugeot 807 has 2 millimeters longer wheelbase than Citroen C8. Therefore the Peugeot 807 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
The Peugeot 807 is 2 millimeters longer when compared to the Citroen C8 2.0 i 16V 138HP manual. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Peugeot 807 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Peugeot 807 will be better driven but the Citroen C8 will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of stuff to it. The difference of 7 millimeters to the advantage of the Peugeot 807 is not big and does not matter much.