Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual vs Volvo 740 Estate 2.0 107HP

Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Bull-Doser All Rights Released into the public domain

6 reasons for

Citroen XM II Hatchback, model available from 1994 to 2000.
It has 3.0 V6 167HP petrol engine produced from 1994 to 2000.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Volvo 740 Estate, model available from 1983 to 1992.
It has 2.0 107HP petrol engine produced from 1985 to 1990.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Volvo 740 Estate 2.0 107HP
Citroen

6 reasons for Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167KM manual in comparison to Volvo 740 Estate 2.0 107HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

167 > 107 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual that has by 56 % more horsepower when compared to the Volvo 740. Consequently the Citroen XM II Hatchback will achieve higher speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual will also give seemingly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
22

Width

1,794 > 1,754 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Citroen XM II Hatchback is 40 millimeters wider in relation to the Volvo 740 Estate. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,855 > 2,277 mm
The Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual has 25 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Volvo. The shorter distance between axles, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Thus the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual with a longer wheelbase may give the smoothest drive. But, the Volvo with shorter wheelbases have tighter turning angles and can corner faster than equivalent cars with longer wheelbases.
8

Engine capacity

2,964 > 2,001 cc
The engine size of the Citroen XM II Hatchback is by 963 cubic centimeters greater than the Volvo 740 Estate 2.0 107HP. In a consequence the Volvo 740 will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
1

Model release date

1994 > 1983
Production of the older car commenced 11 years prior to its competitor hence it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle is equipped with significantly less modern parts .
0

End of model sale

2000 > 1992

Volvo

3 reasons for Volvo 740 Kombi 2.0 107KM in comparison to Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual

Reasons for
6

Length

4,788 > 4,704 mm
The Volvo is 2 % longer than the Citroen. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Volvo probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Volvo will be better driven but the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,435 > 1,387 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference of 48 mm in favor of the Volvo is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual Volvo 740 Estate 2.0 107HP
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 1994 1983
    Facelifting no no
    Class E E
    Payload 1,997 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK