The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual that has by 56 % more horsepower when compared to the Volvo 740. Consequently the Citroen XM II Hatchback will achieve higher speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual will also give seemingly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Citroen XM II Hatchback is 40 millimeters wider in relation to the Volvo 740 Estate. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual has 25 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Volvo. The shorter distance between axles, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Thus the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual with a longer wheelbase may give the smoothest drive. But, the Volvo with shorter wheelbases have tighter turning angles and can corner faster than equivalent cars with longer wheelbases.
The engine size of the Citroen XM II Hatchback is by 963 cubic centimeters greater than the Volvo 740 Estate 2.0 107HP. In a consequence the Volvo 740 will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Citroen XM II Hatchback 3.0 V6 167HP manual will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
Model release date
Production of the older car commenced 11 years prior to its competitor hence it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle is equipped with significantly less modern parts .