Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual vs Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual

Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

9 reasons for

Citroen Xantia II Hatchback, model available from 1998 to 2001.
It has 1.8 i 16V 110HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Mazda 626 V Hatchback, model available from 1997 to 2002.
It has 1.9 100HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual
Citroen

9 reasons for Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110KM manual in comparison to Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

110 > 100 hp
The horsepower of the Citroen is 10 % grater than the Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual. Because the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance largely.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.9 > 12.6 s
The Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in comparison to the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual. The difference in the amount of 6 % is not really significant and it should not be substantially taken into account when choosing one of compared cars.
33

Top speed

194 > 182 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Citroen Xantia II Hatchback is greater compared with the Mazda 626 V by 7, which allows the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 12 km/h is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,755 > 1,705 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual is 50 millimeters wider in relation to the Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,745 > 2,613 mm
The Citroen Xantia II has 5 % longer wheelbase in relation to Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual. Therefore the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
1

Model release date

1998 > 1997
Because of the fact that the Mazda 626 V Hatchback was unveiled only 1 year before the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback might have slightly more modern solutions used in it.
0

Payload

1,770 > 1,685 kg
0

Front track

1,505 > 1,465 mm
0

Curb weight

1,265 > 1,182 kg

Mazda

8 reasons for Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100KM manual in comparison to Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

9.9 > 12.2 l
The Mazda 626 V Hatchback consumes of 19 percent fuel fewer in city traffic in comparison to the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual. The Mazda, as a representative of large family cars segment, burns up of 0.7 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “middle” segment is 10.6 l/100Km.
38

Trunk capacity

502 > 436 l
The boot of the Mazda is only 66 liters bigger than the Citroen. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both cars have similar trunk capacity.
12

Urban range

634 > 542 km
8

Engine capacity

1,840 > 1,763 cc
The Mazda 626 V Hatchback has by 77 cc larger cubic capacity than the Citroen. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both values does not vary much.
6

Length

4,572 > 4,528 mm
The Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual is 44 mm longer in comparison to the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. While the Mazda 626 V occurs to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Citroen Xantia II may appeal to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,471 > 1,452 mm
1

Height

1,429 > 1,398 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mazda, which is by 2 % higher than the Citroen Xantia II Hatchback, is appropriate option for you. However, compared cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

End of model sale

2002 > 2001

Cars specifications

Citroen Xantia II Hatchback 1.8 i 16V 110HP manual Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1998 1997
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload 1,770 kg 1,685 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK