Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual vs Dacia 1100 1.1 43HP manual

Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Source: Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

11 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt IV, model available from 1992 to 1996.
It has 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP petrol engine produced from 1992 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Dacia 1100, model available from 1968 to 1971.
It has 1.1 43HP petrol engine produced from 1968 to 1971.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

Dacia 1100 1.1 43HP manual

11 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75KM manual in comparison to Dacia 1100 1.1 43HP manual

Reasons for

Maximal power

75 > 43 hp
The Mitsubishi Colt IV comes with petrol which produce by 32 more horsepower than the the engine of the Dacia 1100, transforming the car to a much more dynamic character. It seems to be googd option for drivers who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.

Top speed

170 > 133 km/h
The Dacia 1100 has by 37 kilometers/hour lower maximum velocity in relation to the Mitsubishi, because of which covering a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference may be noticeable during riding on highways to the car of Mitsubishi brand advantage.


1,680 > 1,491 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mitsubishi is 189 mm wider than the Dacia 1100. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.


2,415 > 2,277 mm
Mitsubishi has 6 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Dacia 1100 1.1 43HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.

Engine capacity

1,298 > 1,107 cc
The Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual has by 17 % greater engine size in relation to the Dacia 1100. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both figures are quite simmilar.

Price range

popular > cheap

Model release date

1992 > 1968

Valves per cylinder

3 > 2

End of model sale

1996 > 1971


12 > 8

Curb weight

904 > 760 kg


5 reasons for Dacia 1100 1.1 43KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Reasons for

Average consumption

6.8 > 7.1 l
The Dacia burns up 0.3 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual. The Dacia 1100 1.1 43HP manual, which is classified in „B” class burns up by 0.8 l more amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6 l.


4,000 > 3,877 mm
The Dacia 1100 is 3 percent longer in relation to the Mitsubishi Colt IV. Long cars are more spacious and usually have more storage space. While the Dacia 1100 occurs to be better pick for families or persons who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Mitsubishi may be more appropriate to women because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.

Number of doors

4 > 3
The three-door model of Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual is easy to place things into a boot, whereas 4-door Dacia 1100 offers more convenient getting into the car, more quiet interior but smaller boot lid.


1,375 > 1,364 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 1 percent in favor of the Dacia 1100 1.1 43HP manual is small and does not matter much.

Maximal power RPM

4,600 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual Dacia 1100 1.1 43HP manual
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 1992 1968
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,450 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK