Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released

12 reasons for

Dacia Duster SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 16V 105HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
Dacia

12 reasons for Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
29

Maximal torque RPM

3,750 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to check a torque graph.
20

Width

1,822 > 1,770 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The width of the Dacia Duster is larger only by 52 mm than the Mitsubishi and is not really important. The average for the „mini 4x4” segment is approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 1 % larger than the same attribute of the Dacia Duster SUV.
16

Wheelbase

2,679 > 2,676 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Dacia Duster SUV has 3 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Dacia Duster SUV should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
9

Length

4,318 > 4,296 mm
The Dacia is 22 mm longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Long cars more of passenger space and usually have bigger trunk. While the Dacia Duster SUV seems to be better pick for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi ASX may be more appropriate to the young because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
8

Ground clearance

211 > 171 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many relevant features of a vehicle. It is very important for SUV cars still all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105HP manual 4x4 has 23 % larger clearance in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX. In addition to effective mobility in rough terrain, the Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105HP manual 4x4 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large kerbstones, for example.
7

Gross trailer weight

1,503 > 1,102 kg
4

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,589 cc
The Dacia has by 8 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not vary much.
3

Rear track

1,570 > 1,525 mm
2

Height

1,623 > 1,615 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105HP manual 4x4, which is by 8 mm higher than the Mitsubishi, is appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,750 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,560 > 1,525 mm
0

Curb weight

1,252 > 1,240 kg

Mitsubishi

11 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

117 > 105 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Mitsubishi ASX SUV which has by 11 % horsepower more when compared to the Dacia, which makes this car slightly faster. Thanks to more horsepower the Mitsubishi ASX will as well provide slightly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
115

Average consumption

6.2 > 8 l
The Mitsubishi ASX burns up 1.8 l fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle than the Dacia. The difference in the amount of 23 % will be perceptible in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will result in a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

152 > 146 Nm
The Mitsubishi ASX SUV has 6 Nm more torque in comparison to the Dacia Duster. Although the majority of drivers do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it informs the best how a vehicle is speeding up. In this case the difference is not really big so the difference will not be much noticeable.
54

Urban consumption

7.8 > 10.4 l
The fuel economy running around the town is considerably to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual's advantage. This vehicle burns 25 % fewer petrol running around the town in relation to the Dacia. Better fuel econumy means an increase in cruising range.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.4 > 12.8 s
A small difference in the amount of 11 percent suggests that the Dacia Duster is the worst car of these two . In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Dacia Duster, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 1.9 s higher than this of Dacia vehicle.
28

Top speed

183 > 160 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Mitsubishi ASX SUV is greater in relation to this of the Dacia Duster SUV by 23 kilometers/hour, which allows the Mitsubishi ASX SUV to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 23 kilometers/hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
23

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 6.8 l
7

Maximum load capacity

625 > 550 kg
2

Price range

popular > cheap
0

Payload

1,869 > 1,800 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

746 > 665 kg
Advantages

Part ex

Long term value

Cars specifications

Dacia Duster SUV 1.6 16V 105HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,503 kg 1,102 kg
    Model release date 2010 2010
    Price range cheap popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK