Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP vs Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP

Source: wikipedia.org Pibwl Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

7 reasons for

Daewoo Honker, model available from 1985 to 2004.
It has 1.6 60HP petrol engine produced from 1988 to 1993.
Drive has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Toyota 4Runner III, model available from 1995 to 2003.
It has 2.7 16V 152HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2003.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

7 reasons for Daewoo Honker 1.6 60KM in comparison to Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Reasons for


1,935 > 1,690 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Daewoo Honker is 245 mm wider in relation to the Toyota 4Runner III. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.


2,821 > 2,625 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Daewoo Honker has 7 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Toyota. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Daewoo Honker should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.


4,511 > 4,470 mm
The Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP is 1 percent longer when compared to the Toyota. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Daewoo Honker preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Daewoo Honker will be better driven but the Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .

Rear track

1,535 > 1,422 mm


2,197 > 1,746 mm
The Daewoo is by 451 mm higher than the Toyota. As a result the Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP is better for getting in and out of the it and gives impression of more safety when siting high behind the wheel. This also guarantees good visibility in all directions and easy navigation, even on congested streets. The Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP is surely more convenient for families nevertheless it is not recommended for drivers who are looking for dynamic driving and sporting thrill.

Front track

1,573 > 1,429 mm

End of model sale

2004 > 2003


6 reasons for Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152KM manual in comparison to Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP

Reasons for

Maximal power

152 > 60 hp
The Toyota 4Runner III is distinctly snappier compared with the Toyota 4Runner III as it has by o 153 % higher horsepower. The characteristic of this vehicle will give you a way more experience of moving with this car.

Engine capacity

2,694 > 1,601 cc
The engine size of the Toyota 4Runner III is by 1,093 cc larger in relation to the Daewoo. As a result the Daewoo Honker will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Toyota will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual is more convenient and if you frequently travel with more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP generally look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Daewoo Honker may be better one.

Price range

popular > cheap

Model release date

1995 > 1985
Production of the older car started much more earlier than Daewoo Honker thus it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle gives way to Toyota 4Runner III because it has significantly less modern solutions applied.

Front overhang

735 > 751 mm

Cars specifications

Daewoo Honker 1.6 60HP Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual
    Price range cheap popular
    Model release date 1985 1995
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    End of model sale 2004 2003
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK