Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual vs Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75HP manual

Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

24 reasons for

Kia cee'd I Hatchback, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.4 109HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Daewoo Lanos Hatchback, model available from 1997 to 2004.
It has 1.4 i 75HP petrol engine produced from 1997 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75HP manual
Kia

24 reasons for Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109KM manual in comparison to Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

109 > 75 hp
The Kia cee'd I Hatchback comes with petrol which makes by 45 percent more horsepower over the Daewoo Lanos, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It seems to be better option to those who want to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 7 l
The Kia cee'd I Hatchback uses 0.7 l fewer in the combined cycle in comparison to the Daewoo Lanos. The difference in the amount of 10 % is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless within some time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

7.6 > 10 l
The fuel consumption (urban) is considerably to the Kia cee'd I's advantage. This automobile uses 2.4 l fewer gasoline in city traffic when compared to the Daewoo. Better fuel consumption means an increase in cruising range.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.6 > 15 s
The Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in comparison to the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual. The difference at the level of 3.4 s is not really significant and it should not be vitally taken by you into as important when buying one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

338 > 250 l
With more trunk space the Kia cee'd I Hatchback will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull one compared with the Daewoo Lanos. If the capacity of the trunk is appeals to you, the Kia cee'd I will be better choice because it is about 35 percent larger than the trunk of its rival.
33

Top speed

187 > 166 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Kia is greater as compared to this of the Daewoo which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 13 percent is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,790 > 1,678 mm
Width of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual is widther only by 112 millimeters in comparison to the Daewoo and is not really relevant. The medium for the „compact” class is 1,703 millimeters and is by 5 % smaller than the same attribute of the Kia cee'd I Hatchback.
15

Wheelbase

2,659 > 2,524 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Kia cee'd I Hatchback has 135 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Daewoo Lanos. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Kia should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,395 > 1,350 cc
The Kia cee'd I Hatchback has 3 percent larger engine capacity than the Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75HP manual. Because the difference is small, the Kia cee'd I Hatchback should accelerate slightly better, if other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

603 > 590 kg
6

Length

4,235 > 4,074 mm
The Kia cee'd I Hatchback is 161 mm longer when compared to the Daewoo Lanos. Long vehicles are more spacious and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual seems to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Daewoo may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,544 > 1,422 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Model release date

2006 > 1997
Production of the older car commenced much more earlier than its competitor thus it is reasonable to suppose that this car is equipped with not so modern parts .
1

Height

1,479 > 1,430 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Kia, which is by 3 percent higher than the Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75HP manual, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

195 > 175 mm
0

Payload

1,878 > 1,595 kg
0

Front track

1,546 > 1,405 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2012 > 2004
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

15 > 13 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,277 > 1,004 kg

Daewoo

3 reasons for Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75KM manual in comparison to Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual

Reasons for
0

Maximal power RPM

5,400 > 6,200 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

638 > 887 mm
0

Rear overhang

717 > 864 mm

Cars specifications

Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual Daewoo Lanos Hatchback 1.4 i 75HP manual
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2006 1997
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,878 kg 1,595 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK