Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

13 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top, model available from 1987 to 1993.
It has 2.2 i 91HP petrol engine produced from 1991 to 1993.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual
Nissan

13 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

115 > 91 hp
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has by 26 % more horsepower in relation to Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual. The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be distinctly better speed up owing to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also overtaking other vehicles while driving should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with stronger motor.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 15 l
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual burns up of 54 percent gasoline less while driving inside city compared to the Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top. The Nissan Qashqai II, which is classified in compact SUV segment, uses of 2.7 l per 100 km less than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l per 100 km.
33

Top speed

183 > 130 km/h
The Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual has 41 % smaller top speed in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II, on account of which driving a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference might be noticeable during riding on fast and long routes to the car of Nissan brand advantage.
22

Width

1,800 > 1,690 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is widther only by 7 % than the Daihatsu Rocky I and is not really relevant. The average for the „mini 4x4” class is approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Nissan Qashqai II.
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,530 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Nissan has 5 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Daihatsu Rocky I. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Nissan Qashqai II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

797 > 400 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has a one extra gear in comparison to the Daihatsu Rocky I. Usually the additional speed is a taller one thanks to which the previous gears can be narrower to allow better acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear also helps to lower fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
6

Length

4,380 > 4,166 mm
The Nissan is 214 mm longer when compared to the Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Nissan Qashqai II very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Nissan Qashqai II will be better driven ,however, the Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Nissan is more usable and if you regularly carry more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Daihatsu very often look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top may be a good one.
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Model release date

2014 > 1987
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8

Daihatsu

8 reasons for Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

520 > 438 l
With more boot size the Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull one compared with the Nissan Qashqai II. If the capacity of the trunk is important to you, the Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top will be better choice as it is around 82 l larger than the trunk of its contender.
19

Fuel tank

59 > 54 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Daihatsu Rocky I which is able to carry by 5 l more fuel compared with the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
8

Engine capacity

2,238 > 1,198 cc
The Daihatsu Rocky I has 87 percent greater engine displacement than the Nissan. The difference is notable. Consequently the Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size affects worst fuel economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

730 > 542 kg
1

Height

1,925 > 1,590 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Daihatsu Rocky I, which is by 335 millimeters higher than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, is better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,200 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,196 > 1,860 kg
0

Curb weight

1,469 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Daihatsu Rocky I Soft Top 2.2 i 91HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2014 1987
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK