The Fiat has 50 l
compared with the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual.
Such a difference is quite significant
therefore it will matters when it comes to the comfort of the
car’s usage. At the same time that
the Fiat Punto 2012 has
trunk size than the average in the
same class. Larger
trunk will be useful during family
journeys and also during
daily car’s usage.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Fiat is 32 millimeters wider than the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank size is Fiat Punto 2012 Hatchback 3d that is able to carry by 5 l more petrol in relation to the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual.
Fiat has 4 % longer wheelbase than the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
The Fiat Punto 2012 Hatchback 3d has 243 cubic centimeters bigger engine size in relation to the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Fiat Punto 2012 should accelerate a bit faster, of course assuming that other paramerters are equal.
The Fiat Punto 2012 Hatchback 3d is 13 % longer when compared to the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual. Long vehicles have more interior space and usually provide bigger trunk. Although the Fiat Punto 2012 Hatchback 3d occurs to be better for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Daihatsu Sirion II may be more appropriate to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
Model release date
Production of the older car started 7 years prior to its contender hence it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle is equipped with not so modern technologies used.