Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual vs Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual

Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

14 reasons for

Renault Clio IV Grandtour, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 16V 74HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Daihatsu Sirion II, model available from 2005.
It has 1.0 i 12V 69HP petrol engine produced from 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual
Renault

14 reasons for Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74KM manual in comparison to Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

74 > 69 hp
The horsepower of the Renault Clio IV Grandtour is 5 horsepowers bigger in relation to the Daihatsu Sirion II. While the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
38

Trunk capacity

443 > 226 l
The boot of the Renault Clio IV Grandtour is 217 l larger in relation to the Daihatsu Sirion II. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual will be much more functional. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Top speed

167 > 160 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Renault Clio IV Grandtour is higher in comparison to this of the Daihatsu Sirion II which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 4 % is small and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

46 > 39 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank capacity is Renault Clio IV Grandtour which is able to take by 18 percent more petrol compared with the Daihatsu Sirion II.
15

Wheelbase

2,589 > 2,430 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Renault Clio IV has 159 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Daihatsu. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Renault Clio IV should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,150 > 999 cc
The Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual has 151 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity in relation to the Daihatsu. Because the difference is small, the Renault Clio IV should accelerate a bit dynamically, assuming that other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,267 > 3,605 mm
The Renault is 18 % longer than the Daihatsu Sirion II. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Renault Clio IV very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Renault Clio IV Grandtour will be better driven ,however, the Daihatsu Sirion II will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,506 > 1,478 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Model release date

2012 > 2005
Production of the older vehicle commenced 7 years prior to its rival and for this reason man may suspect that this vehicle is equipped with significantly less modern parts .
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,506 > 1,470 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12

Daihatsu

4 reasons for Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69KM manual in comparison to Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 7 l
The Daihatsu consumes of 13 percent fuel fewer in city traffic than the Renault Clio IV Grandtour. The Daihatsu Sirion II, as a representative of small cars class, burns up of 1.4 l/100Km less than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “subcompact” class is 7.5 l per 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.5 > 15.4 s
A small difference in the amount of 1.9 s indicates that the Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual is the worst car of these two compared. In the „B class, being represented by the Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 12.9 s and is by 20 percent higher than this of Renault vehicle.
12

Urban range

656 > 643 km
1

Height

1,550 > 1,445 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Daihatsu Sirion II, which is by 7 % higher than the Renault Clio IV Grandtour, would be better option for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Cars specifications

Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2012 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload - 1,386 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK