Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 vs Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual

Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Jeep Wrangler III, model available from 2006.
It has 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

12 reasons for

Daihatsu Terios II, model available from 2006.
It has 1.5 16V 105HP petrol engine produced from 2006.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual
Jeep

16 reasons for Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

200 > 105 hp
The Jeep Wrangler III is equipped with petrol which makes by 95 more horsepower over the Daihatsu Terios II, transforming the car to a much more sporty character. It seems to be better car for drivers who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.2 > 11.9 s
A little difference that amounts to 6 % indicates that the Daihatsu Terios II is the worst car of these two . In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual, the medium acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 9 % higher than this of Daihatsu vehicle.
33

Top speed

174 > 160 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Jeep Wrangler III is higher as compared to this of the Daihatsu Terios II which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 14 kilometers/hour is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
22

Width

1,873 > 1,695 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The Jeep is widther only by 178 mm compared with the Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual and is not really relevant. The medium for the „compact SUV” segment equals to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 76 mm larger than the same feature of the Jeep.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 49 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Jeep which can hold by 45 percent more fuel than the Daihatsu.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
9

Ground clearance

265 > 198 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the gap between the vehicle underbody and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Jeep Wrangler III which has 34 percent higher ground clearance than the Daihatsu. This is why the Jeep will cope better with dirt roads and high curbs in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the Jeep Wrangler III.
8

Engine capacity

3,779 > 1,496 cc
Undoubtedly the Jeep wins in this category. The difference at the level of 2,283 cc in relation to the Daihatsu. It is interesting that in „small off-road 4x4” segment, from which the Jeep Wrangler III comes from, the average engine displacement amounts to 2,104 cc and the biggest engine capacity in this class is 4,201 .
6

Length

4,218 > 4,059 mm
The Jeep Wrangler III is 4 % longer in comparison to the Daihatsu Terios II. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Jeep very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Jeep will be better driven but the Daihatsu will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,460 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Height

1,865 > 1,680 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Jeep, which is by 11 % higher than the Daihatsu, is appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,215 > 1,719 kg
0

Front track

1,571 > 1,450 mm
0

Curb weight

1,709 > 1,146 kg

Daihatsu

12 reasons for Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105KM manual in comparison to Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

9.7 > 16.2 l
The Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual uses 40 % of fuel fewer in the city in relation to the Jeep Wrangler III. The Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual, that comes from mini 4x4 class, burns up 0.1 l more petrol, which is by 1 percent more fuel consumption than the average in its segment. The difference in this category between these two cars is quite big, so remember that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should choose models with similar characteristics.
38

Trunk capacity

380 > 141 l
The boot of the Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual is 170 % more spacious in relation to the Jeep Wrangler III. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Daihatsu Terios II will be much more useful. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can transport.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

756 > 431 l
15

Wheelbase

2,574 > 2,423 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate car's weight distribution. Daihatsu has 6 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Jeep. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Daihatsu should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

515 > 435 km
8

Maximum load capacity

570 > 515 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
A way more comfortable and practical car is five-door Daihatsu. The two-door Jeep Wrangler III offers little pluses, besides more attractive silhouette.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Front overhang

673 > 805 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Rear overhang

800 > 1,000 mm

Cars specifications

Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 16V 105HP manual
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Code name JK -
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK