Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 vs Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual

Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

17 reasons for

Toyota RAV4 III, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.0 i 16V 152HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Daihatsu Terios II, model available from 2006.
It has 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP petrol engine produced from 2006.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual
Toyota

17 reasons for Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

152 > 105 hp
The Toyota RAV4 III has by 47 hp more horsepower compared to Daihatsu Terios II. The Toyota RAV4 III will be distinctly quicker accelerate owing to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also overtaking other cars should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with stronger engine.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.6 > 14 s
The Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual speeds up relatively slower compared to the Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 3.4 s is is slightly to the Toyota advantage, however, it should not be strongly taken into account for choosing one of these two vehicles.
38

Trunk capacity

586 > 380 l
The Toyota RAV4 III features 206 liters bigger boot than the Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual. Such a difference is significant therefore it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Toyota has 141 l bigger boot size than the average in the same class. Bigger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during daily driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,468 > 756 l
33

Top speed

185 > 160 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Toyota RAV4 III is greater in comparison to this of the Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 16 percent is little and is imperceptible in daily use.
22

Width

1,819 > 1,695 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Toyota RAV4 III is 7 % wider when compared to the Daihatsu. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 49 l
The Daihatsu gives way to the Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Toyota is able to carry by 12 liters more fuel than its rival.
12

Urban range

545 > 510 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,496 cc
The Toyota RAV4 III has 502 cc larger engine capacity in relation to the Daihatsu Terios II. The difference is relatively big. As a result the Toyota should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size affects worst fuel efficiency.
8

Maximum load capacity

605 > 520 kg
6

Length

4,395 > 4,059 mm
The Toyota RAV4 III is 8 % longer in comparison to the Daihatsu Terios II. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 will be better driven ,however, the Daihatsu will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,559 > 1,460 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Height

1,721 > 1,680 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Toyota RAV4 III, which is by 41 millimeters higher than the Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual, would be better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Payload

2,069 > 1,719 kg
0

Front track

1,560 > 1,450 mm
0

Curb weight

1,465 > 1,196 kg

Daihatsu

2 reasons for Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105KM manual in comparison to Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

9.8 > 11 l
The Daihatsu uses 11 % less petrol in the city in relation to the Toyota RAV4 III. The Daihatsu Terios II, that comes from mini 4x4 class, burns up 0.2 l fewer fuel. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small off-road 4x4 segment is 9.6 l, while the Daihatsu Terios II uses by 3 % more amount of fuel than the average.
15

Wheelbase

2,574 > 2,556 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Daihatsu Terios II has 1 percent longer wheelbase distance than Toyota. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Daihatsu should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.

Cars specifications

Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 Daihatsu Terios II 1.5 i 16V 4WD 105HP manual
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,069 kg 1,719 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK