Dodge Durango III 3.6 V6 294HP automatic vs Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Dodge Durango III 3.6 V6 294HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

9 reasons for

Dodge Durango III, model available from 2011.
It has 3.6 V6 294HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

1 reason for

Mercury Mariner I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
Dodge

9 reasons for Dodge Durango III 3.6 V6 294KM automat in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

294 > 155 hp
The Dodge Durango III has 90 percent more horsepower in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. The Dodge Durango III 3.6 V6 294HP automatic will be distinctly better accelerate because of grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also leaving behind cars or obstacles while driving should be much more easier for the Dodge Durango III equipped with more powerful motor.
22

Width

1,919 > 1,790 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Dodge is 7 percent wider than the Mercury. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

94 > 62 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Dodge Durango III that can carry 32 l more fuel in relation to the Mercury Mariner I. The average fuel tank size in the large off-road 4x4 class, from which the Dodge Durango III comes from, equals 84 l, whereas in large SUV segment (represented by the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP) it equals 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

3,038 > 2,627 mm
Dodge Durango III has 411 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Mercury Mariner I. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
6

Length

5,110 > 4,428 mm
The Dodge Durango III is 15 % longer in comparison to the Mercury Mariner I. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Dodge Durango III probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Dodge Durango III will be better driven ,however, the Mercury Mariner I will be a little easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2011 > 2005
Manufacture of the older car began 6 years prior to its contender hence man may suspect that this vehicle is equipped with significantly less advanced solutions .
1

Height

1,802 > 1,730 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Dodge Durango III, which is by 72 millimeters higher than the Mercury Mariner I, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To people who appreciate more convenient driving a car and don’t need complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend vehicles with automatic transmission. For those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Number of seats

6 > 5

Mercury

1 reason for Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155KM in comparison to Dodge Durango III 3.6 V6 294HP automatic

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

829 > 487 l
With more luggage capacity the Mercury Mariner I will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional one than the Dodge Durango III 3.6 V6 294HP automatic. If the size of the boot is appeals to you, the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP will be better to buy because it is about 70 percent more spacious than the boot of the Dodge.

Cars specifications

Dodge Durango III 3.6 V6 294HP automatic Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,947 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK