Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual vs Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

11 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d, model available from 2012.
It has 1.4 16V 95HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual
Mitsubishi

11 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

117 > 95 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mitsubishi which has by 22 horsepower more in relation to the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d, which makes this car somewhat better in terms of high speed. Because of more horsepower the Mitsubishi ASX SUV will as well give somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

152 > 125 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mitsubishi ASX is 22 % greater than the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d. For this reason, the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will accelerate slightly faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will burn up on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
56

Urban consumption

7.8 > 8.3 l
The fuel consumption of the Mitsubishi ASX SUV is 6 percent smaller when compared to the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it can cause that the car would be considerably cheper to exploate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.4 > 12.4 s
A little difference at the level of 1 second shows that the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d is the worst car of these two compared. In the „minivan segment, being represented by the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual, the medium acceleration amounts to 11.7 s and is by 0.7 s higher than this of Fiat car.
38

Trunk capacity

418 > 398 l
If you are looking for a car by which you could set of for cruises, which could room more luggage , take the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. The Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual is equiped with by 5 % smaller trunk in comparison to the Fiat so probably you would be able to carry one small parcel less. Assessing the luggage compartment pay attention to its dimensions which have appreciable effect on loading capability .
33

Top speed

183 > 178 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Mitsubishi ASX is greater than the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual by 5 km/h, which allows the Mitsubishi ASX SUV to cover quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 5 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is recommended to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 5.1 l
15

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,608 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi has 68 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Fiat. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi ASX SUV should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,589 > 1,368 cc
The Mitsubishi ASX has by 16 % greater engine capacity than the Fiat. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,296 > 4,172 mm
The Mitsubishi ASX is 3 % longer when compared to the Fiat 500L. Long vehicles are more spacious and also provide plenty of trunk space. While the Mitsubishi ASX occurs to be better for families or those who value soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual may appeal to women because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.

Fiat

4 reasons for Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,789 > 1,770 mm
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual is widther by 1 % in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX and is not really important. The average for the „minivan” segment is approximately 1,785 millimeters and is by 4 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d have a higher speed count compared to the Mitsubishi ASX which means that Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d should achieve better speeding up and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not even feel the difference.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2010
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Fiat 500L may have more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,656 > 1,615 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference that amounts to 3 % to the advantage of the Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual is little and does not matter much.

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual Fiat 500L Hatchback 5d 1.4 16V 95HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,102 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV minivan
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK