Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual vs Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Arewicz Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported

20 reasons for

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2006.
It has 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d, model available from 2011.
It has 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual
Fiat

20 reasons for Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90KM manual in comparison to Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

90 > 85 hp
The horsepower of the Fiat Bravo II is 5 hp bigger than the Kia. Because the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance to a large extent.
59

Maximal torque

126 > 122 Nm
The Fiat Bravo II has 4 newton meters more torque than the Kia Rio III. Although most of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.5 > 13.1 s
The Kia Rio III accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in relation to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. The difference in the amount of 0.6 s is quite little and it should not be vitally taken into consideration when buying one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

400 > 288 l
With more luggage capacity the Fiat Bravo II will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional one than the Kia. If the size of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d will be better to buy as it is around 39 % more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,174 > 922 l
33

Top speed

179 > 168 km/h
The top velocity of the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d is greater as compared to this of the Kia which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 11 kilometers per hour is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
22

Width

1,788 > 1,720 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d is widther only by 4 percent in relation to the Kia Rio III and is not really relevant. The medium for the „C” segment amounts to around 1,703 mm and is by 5 percent larger than the same feature of the Fiat Bravo II.
19

Range

921 > 860 km
19

Fuel tank

57 > 42 l
The Kia gives way to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Fiat Bravo II is able to store by 15 liters more fuel compared with the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d.
15

Wheelbase

2,594 > 2,568 mm
The Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual has 1 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Kia. Thanks to this the Fiat Bravo II is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
11

Extra-urban range

1,115 > 1,000 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Fiat have a higher gear count than the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual which means that Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d would have better acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,368 > 1,247 cc
The Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual has by 10 % greater engine capacity in comparison to the Kia Rio III. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values does not differ much.
6

Length

4,334 > 4,045 mm
The Fiat Bravo II is 289 mm longer in relation to the Kia. Long cars have more interior space and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual occurs to be better choice for families or those who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Kia may be more appropriate to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,533 > 1,525 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Fiat Bravo II is more convenient and if you regularly carry more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Kia Rio III generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Kia may be more appropriate.
1

Height

1,500 > 1,453 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 3 percent in favor of the Fiat Bravo II is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,538 > 1,508 mm
0

Curb weight

1,209 > 1,030 kg

Kia

8 reasons for Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85KM manual in comparison to Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.2 > 6.3 l
The Kia Rio III consumes 18 percent fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. The difference in the amount of 18 percent is not significant. Nevertheless within some time it would give a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 8.1 l
The fuel economy in the city is considerably to the Kia Rio III's advantage. This car uses 26 percent fewer gasoline in the city when compared to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 5.3 l
12

Urban range

717 > 716 km
1

Model release date

2011 > 2006
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d may feature more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Front overhang

806 > 973 mm
0

Rear overhang

670 > 762 mm

Cars specifications

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual Kia Rio III Hatchback 3d 1.2 DOHC CVVT 85HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 996 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK