Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual vs Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Arewicz Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

8 reasons for

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2006.
It has 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Nissan Tiida Hatchback, model available from 2004.
It has 1.8 i 126HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

8 reasons for Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90KM manual in comparison to Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Reasons for

112

Average consumption

6.3 > 7.8 l

The Fiat consumes 19 percent fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual. The difference at the level of 1.5 l is not perceptible. However in the long term it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.

Add a comment

Trunk capacity

400 > 300 l

The Fiat features 100 l larger boot in comparison to the Nissan Tiida. Such a difference is big so it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual has 7 liters bigger boot capacity than the average in its segment. Roomy luggage compartment will be useful during family journeys and also during everyday car’s usage.

Add a comment

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,174 > 467 l

Add a comment

Width

1,788 > 1,700 mm

Width of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The width of the Fiat is larger only by 88 millimeters than the Nissan Tiida Hatchback and is not really relevant. The average for the „small family cars” segment equals to approximately 1,703 mm and is by 5 % larger than the width of the Fiat Bravo II.

Add a comment

Range

921 > 667 km

Add a comment

Fuel tank

57 > 51 l

The Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is worst that the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual in the category of fuel tank size. The Fiat is able to carry by 12 percent more fuel compared with its contender.

Add a comment

Length

4,334 > 4,294 mm

The Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual is 40 millimeters longer in relation to the Nissan Tiida. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Tiida Hatchback will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.

Add a comment

Model release date

2006 > 2004

The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual may have more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.

Add a comment

Reasons for

135

Maximal power

126 > 90 hp

The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Nissan Tiida Hatchback which has by 36 more horsepower when compared to the Fiat Bravo II. As a result the Nissan Tiida Hatchback can achieve higher velocity. Having more horsepower the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual should also provide noticeably more flexiblility in specific speeds.

Add a comment

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.4 > 12.5 s

The Fiat can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower in comparison to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback. The difference at the level of 2.1 s is quite little and it should not be strongly taken by you into consideration for selecting the better one of presented vehicles.

Add a comment

Top speed

195 > 179 km/h

The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Nissan Tiida Hatchback is greater compared with the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d by 16 kilometers/hour, which allows the Nissan Tiida Hatchback to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 percent is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.

Add a comment

Wheelbase

2,604 > 2,594 mm

The Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual has 10 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Fiat. As a result the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.

Add a comment

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,368 cc

The engine capacity of the Nissan Tiida Hatchback is by 31 percent bigger than the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. As a result the Fiat will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Nissan Tiida Hatchback will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.

Add a comment

Height

1,534 > 1,500 mm

If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Nissan, which is by 2 percent higher than the Fiat, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.

Add a comment