Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual vs Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual

Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

17 reasons for

Seat Leon III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 TSI 105HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2006.
It has 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual
Seat

17 reasons for Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105KM manual in comparison to Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

105 > 90 hp
The horsepower of the Seat Leon III is by 15 horsepowers bigger when compared to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. As the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance to a large extent.
112

Average consumption

4.7 > 6.3 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Seat Leon III's advantage. This car consumes 1.6 l fewer gasoline in the combined cycle than the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the small family cars segment, in which the Seat Leon III is classified, equals to 6.8 l while the Seat Leon III Hatchback consumes by 31 % less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

175 > 126 Nm
Thanks to 49 newton meters more torque, the engine of the Seat Leon III Hatchback distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Fiat Bravo II. This, in turn, have relevant effects on acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

5.9 > 8.1 l
The Seat Leon III Hatchback burns up of 2.2 l gasoline less in the urban cycle compared to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. The Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual, as a representative of C segment, burns up of 2.8 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “compact” segment is 8.7 l per 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10 > 12.5 s
A small difference that amounts to 2.5 s shows that the Fiat is the worst car of these two presented. In the „lower middle segment, being represented by the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 11.3 s and is by 1.2 s higher than this of Fiat vehicle.
33

Top speed

191 > 179 km/h
The maximum speed of the Seat Leon III Hatchback is higher in comparison to this of the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 12 kilometers/hour is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,400 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Seat Leon III. The engine of the Fiat Bravo II reaches its full efficiency at 4,500 revolutions/minute which is by 69 % lower compared with the Seat Leon III.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.2 > 5.3 l
19

Range

1,020 > 921 km
15

Wheelbase

2,636 > 2,594 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Seat Leon III Hatchback has 2 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

820 > 716 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,190 > 1,115 km
8

Gross trailer weight

1,500 > 996 kg
1

Model release date

2013 > 2006
Production of the older car started 7 years prior to its rival hence it is reasonable to suppose that this car features not so modern technologies applied.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,539 > 1,538 mm
0

Front overhang

853 > 973 mm

Fiat

9 reasons for Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90KM manual in comparison to Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

400 > 380 l
The boot of the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual is only 5 % bigger than the Seat Leon III Hatchback. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar trunk capacity.
22

Width

1,788 > 1,780 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Fiat Bravo II is 8 millimeters wider when compared to the Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

57 > 50 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the category of fuel tank size is Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d that is able to carry by 14 % more petrol than the Seat Leon III Hatchback.
8

Engine capacity

1,368 > 1,198 cc
The Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d has by 170 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity than the Seat Leon III. This may have a little impact when it comes to accleration, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,334 > 4,259 mm
The Fiat is 75 millimeters longer than the Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual. Long vehicles have more interior space and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d seems to be better option for families or persons who value convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Seat Leon III may appeal to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,533 > 1,509 mm
1

Height

1,500 > 1,461 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 3 percent in favor of the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Rear overhang

762 > 774 mm
0

Curb weight

1,209 > 1,194 kg

Cars specifications

Seat Leon III Hatchback 1.2 TSI 105HP manual Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,500 kg 996 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK