The horsepower is a something that most of car fans look at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Mazda 3 III which has by 33 more horsepower when compared to the Fiat Palio I. As a result the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual can achieve higher top speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Mazda 3 III should also give seemingly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
The fuel economy is considerably to Mazda's advantage. This vehicle burns 28 percent less petrol in the combined cycle in relation to the Fiat Palio I Hatchback. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the compact segment, in which the Mazda is classified, is 6.8 l while the Mazda needs by 28 percent less fuel than the average.
Because of 46 percent more torque, the engine of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Fiat Palio I Hatchback 1.2 i 67HP manual. This, in turn, produces better acceleration.
The Mazda uses 2.8 l less gasoline running around the town when compared to the Fiat Palio I Hatchback. The difference in the amount of 2.8 l is quite appreciable in everyday usage of the ride. Moreover, in a long run it will even give you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may vary depending on how you drive
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 10.8 s, which is 16 % in relation to the Fiat Palio I. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a vehicle.
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual has 85 liters
in relation to the Fiat.
Such a difference is big
so it will distinctly is relevant to the comfort of the
car’s usage. It is worth to note that
the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual has
trunk size than the average in the
same class. More spacious
boot will be useful during family
journeys and also during
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Mazda 3 III Hatchback is greater compared with of the Fiat by 22 kilometers/hour, which allows the Mazda 3 III to cover faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 22 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
The difference at the level of 28 percent between selected cars is quite significant. For a urban use where such a things as maneuverability and ease of parking play a role, probably the Fiat Palio I Hatchback 1.2 i 67HP manual should be more suitable . However, the Mazda 3 III is characterized by a better comfort, more spacious cabin and stiffer handling when driving fast in steep curves.
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank size is Mazda 3 III that can take by 5 l more petrol compared with the Fiat.
The Mazda 3 III has 15 percent longer wheelbase when compared to Fiat Palio I Hatchback 1.2 i 67HP manual. Thanks to this the Mazda is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
Number of gears
The Mazda has a one more
speed in relation to the
Fiat Palio I Hatchback. Sometimes the
additional speed is a taller one thanks to which the previous
gears can be shorter to
allow better acceleration in the
lower speeds. One more speed also have an effect on decreasing
fuel consumption and CO2 output.
The Mazda has by 254 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity in relation to the Fiat Palio I Hatchback. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both values does not vary much.
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual is 19 percent longer in comparison to the Fiat. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Mazda 3 III probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual will be better driven but the Fiat Palio I will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 5 millimeters in favor of the Mazda is little and does not matter much.