Honda City VI 1.4 i 100HP manual vs Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual

Honda City VI 1.4 i 100HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Zynos958 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

15 reasons for

Honda City VI, model available from 2009 to 2011.
It has 1.4 i 100HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2010 to 2011.
It has 1.2 65HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2010.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual
Honda

15 reasons for Honda City VI 1.4 i 100KM manual in comparison to Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

100 > 65 hp
The Honda City VI 1.4 i 100HP manual has 54 % more horsepower in comparison to Fiat Punto Evo. The Honda will be distinctly better accelerate thanks to grater horsepower. Also passing other vehicles while driving should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

127 > 100 Nm
The Honda City VI has 27 Nm more torque when compared to the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual. The difference at this level is relevant, what means that the Honda City VI 1.4 i 100HP manual will accelerate significantly better.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.6 > 14.5 s
The Fiat Punto Evo can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared to the Honda City VI. The difference at the level of 2.9 s is quite low and for that reason it should not be vitally taken by you into as important for selecting the better one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

507 > 275 l
The trunk of the Honda City VI is 232 liters bigger compared to the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Honda City VI will be a way more handy. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can take.
33

Top speed

182 > 155 km/h
The maximum velocity of the Honda City VI is greater as compared to this of the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 17 percent is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
22

Width

1,715 > 1,690 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Honda City VI is 25 millimeters wider in comparison to the Fiat Punto Evo. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,545 > 2,512 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Honda City VI has 1 percent longer wheelbase distance than Fiat. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Honda City VI should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,340 > 1,242 cc
The Honda City VI has 8 percent larger cubic capacity compared to the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d. For the reason that the difference is little, the Honda should accelerate only a bit faster, if other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,420 > 4,062 mm
The Honda City VI is 358 mm longer in comparison to the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual. Long cars more of passenger space and usually have bigger trunk. While the Honda seems to be better for families or those who love the idea of convenient rides, the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual may be more appropriate to women as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,478 > 1,468 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 3
The 3-door model of Fiat Punto Evo is easy to place luggage into a trunk, whereas four-door Honda City VI offers more convenient getting into the vehicle, reduced cabin noise at the expense of smaller boot lid.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

448 > 397 kg
0

Front track

1,492 > 1,473 mm
0

Curb weight

1,094 > 1,014 kg

Fiat

11 reasons for Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65KM manual in comparison to Honda City VI 1.4 i 100HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.7 > 6.2 l
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual uses 8 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Honda City VI. The Fiat Punto Evo, being palced in „B” segment burns up by 0.3 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 6 l.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,000 > 4,800 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the highest torque is delivered shows us how fast an engine reaches its best efficiency with increase in rotational speed. The lower rotational speed or the wider range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.9 > 5.1 l
19

Range

789 > 700 km
19

Fuel tank

44 > 43 l
The Honda City VI gives way to the Fiat Punto Evo in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d is able to carry by 2 % more fuel in comparison to its contender.
12

Urban range

616 > 575 km
11

Extra-urban range

938 > 808 km
8

Gross trailer weight

905 > 796 kg
1

Model release date

2010 > 2009
Given that the Honda City VI's production began only 1 year prior to the Fiat Punto Evo, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual may have slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,492 > 1,469 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Fiat, which is by 2 % higher than the Honda, would be better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Honda City VI 1.4 i 100HP manual Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 796 kg 905 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2009 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK