Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual vs Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP automatic

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released

25 reasons for

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2010 to 2011.
It has 1.2 65HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2010.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Nissan Pixo, model available from 2008.
It has 1.0 68HP ic petrol engine produced from 2008.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP automatic
Fiat

25 reasons for Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65KM manual in comparison to Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP automatic

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

100 > 90 Nm
Maximum torque of the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d is 11 % bigger than the Nissan Pixo. For this reason, the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Fiat will consume on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

14.5 > 17 s
A little difference at the level of 2.5 s shows that the Nissan Pixo is somewhat beaten here. In the „B” segment, to which the Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP automatic is assigned, the medium acceleration is 12.9 s and is by 32 % faster than acceleration of Nissan’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

275 > 129 l
The boot of the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual is 113 percent more spacious compared to the Nissan Pixo. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual will be a way more useful. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can load.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,031 > 368 l
33

Top speed

155 > 150 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d is greater compared with the Nissan Pixo by 5 kilometers per hour, which allows the Fiat to travel quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,000 > 3,405 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to see a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,690 > 1,600 mm
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Fiat Punto Evo is larger only by 90 mm in relation to the Nissan Pixo and is not really important. The medium for the „B” segment amounts to around 1,645 millimeters and is by 3 percent larger than the same feature of the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d.
19

Range

789 > 686 km
19

Fuel tank

44 > 34 l
The Nissan Pixo gives way to the Fiat Punto Evo in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Fiat is able to store by 29 % more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,512 > 2,361 mm
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual has 151 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan. Thanks to this the Fiat is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
12

Urban range

616 > 538 km
11

Extra-urban range

938 > 814 km
10

Number of gears

5 > 4 gears
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual have a higher gear count in comparison to the Nissan which means that Fiat will have better speeding up and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,242 > 997 cc
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual has by 245 cubic centimeters greater engine displacement when compared to the Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP automatic. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
8

Gross trailer weight

905 > 205 kg
6

Length

4,062 > 3,565 mm
The Fiat Punto Evo is 497 millimeters longer when compared to the Nissan Pixo. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual will be better driven but the Nissan will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,468 > 1,401 mm
1

Model release date

2010 > 2008
Because of the fact that the Nissan Pixo debuted only 2 years earlier than the Fiat, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d might have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,492 > 1,470 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Fiat, which is by 22 millimeters higher than the Nissan Pixo, is better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

175 > 165 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,473 > 1,405 mm
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Curb weight

1,014 > 911 kg

Nissan

8 reasons for Nissan Pixo 1.0 68KM automat in comparison to Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

68 > 65 hp
The horsepower of the Nissan Pixo is by 3 hp bigger than the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d. Because the difference is not big this should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 5.7 l
The Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP automatic uses 11 % fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Fiat Punto Evo. The Nissan, which is classified in „subcompact” class uses by 0.9 l less of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6 liters.
56

Urban consumption

6.5 > 7.3 l
The fuel consumption of the Nissan Pixo is 0.8 l better when compared to the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long term it can make that your car would be much less expensive to use.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 4.9 l
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Nissan is more convenient and if you frequently travel with more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d generally look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Fiat may be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A stick shift that is placed in the Fiat Punto Evo is more simpler built and is cheaper in usage but it is less comfortable as it requires the driver to work with the clutch to shift gears very often, especialy in a in rush hour in urban traffic where drivers have lots of frequent stop and go situations. An automatic gearbox which is put in the Nissan Pixo with gears in the amount of 4 – speeds transmission is in our opinion better one to have.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

12 > 8

Cars specifications

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 905 kg 205 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2008
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK