The horsepower of the Fiat is by 12 % bigger than the Renault Clio II Hatchback. Because the difference is little it should not affect the car performance extensively.
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual uses 8 % less fuel in urban cycle in relation to the Renault Clio II Hatchback. The difference at the level of 8 % is very big in everyday use of vehicle. Additionally, within many months it may bring gigantic cost savings. Also keep in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably increased if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference at the level of 3 percent shows that the Renault is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „B class, being represented by the Renault Clio II, the average acceleration is 12.9 s and is by 2.1 s higher than this of Renault vehicle.
The boot of the Fiat is only 20 l bigger than the Renault. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same trunk size.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d is 3 percent wider in relation to the Renault. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d has 41 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Renault Clio II. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual has 8 percent larger engine displacement in relation to the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual. For the reason that the difference is small, the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d should accelerate only a bit better, if other paramerters are equal.
The Fiat is 8 % longer in relation to the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual. The length of the car plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Fiat Punto Evo will be better driven ,however, the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
Model release date
Manufacture of the older car commenced much more earlier than its contender thus we may expect that this car gives way to Fiat Punto Evo because it has not so advanced technologies .
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 5 % in favor of the Fiat Punto Evo is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.