Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual vs Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released

15 reasons for

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2010 to 2011.
It has 1.2 65HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2010.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Renault Clio II Hatchback, model available from 1998 to 2010.
It has 1.1 58HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual
Fiat

15 reasons for Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65KM manual in comparison to Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

65 > 58 hp
The horsepower of the Fiat is by 12 % bigger than the Renault Clio II Hatchback. Because the difference is little it should not affect the car performance extensively.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 7.9 l
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual uses 8 % less fuel in urban cycle in relation to the Renault Clio II Hatchback. The difference at the level of 8 % is very big in everyday use of vehicle. Additionally, within many months it may bring gigantic cost savings. Also keep in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably increased if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

14.5 > 15 s
A little difference at the level of 3 percent shows that the Renault is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „B class, being represented by the Renault Clio II, the average acceleration is 12.9 s and is by 2.1 s higher than this of Renault vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

275 > 255 l
The boot of the Fiat is only 20 l bigger than the Renault. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same trunk size.
22

Width

1,690 > 1,636 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d is 3 percent wider in relation to the Renault. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,512 > 2,471 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d has 41 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Renault Clio II. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

616 > 608 km
8

Engine capacity

1,242 > 1,150 cc
The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual has 8 percent larger engine displacement in relation to the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual. For the reason that the difference is small, the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d should accelerate only a bit better, if other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,062 > 3,768 mm
The Fiat is 8 % longer in relation to the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual. The length of the car plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Fiat Punto Evo will be better driven ,however, the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2010 > 1998
Manufacture of the older car commenced much more earlier than its contender thus we may expect that this car gives way to Fiat Punto Evo because it has not so advanced technologies .
1

Height

1,492 > 1,417 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 5 % in favor of the Fiat Punto Evo is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

175 > 165 mm
0

End of model sale

2011 > 2010
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Curb weight

1,014 > 880 kg

Renault

5 reasons for Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58KM manual in comparison to Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,035 > 1,031 l
33

Top speed

160 > 155 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Renault Clio II is greater than the Fiat by 5 kilometers/hour, which allows the Renault to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 5 km/h is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

49 > 44 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Renault Clio II Hatchback that can comprise 11 percent more fuel in comparison to the Fiat Punto Evo. The average fuel tank size in the supermini segment, from which the Renault Clio II Hatchback comes from, amounts to 44 l, whereas in small cars segment (represented by the Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual) it amounts to 44 l.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4

Cars specifications

Fiat Punto Evo Hatchback 3d 1.2 65HP manual Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 905 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK