Mazda 3 I Hatchback 2.3 156HP vs Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113HP manual

Mazda 3 I Hatchback 2.3 156HP

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

11 reasons for

Mazda 3 I Hatchback, model available from 2003 to 2009.
It has 2.3 156HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2009.
Drive has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Fiat Tipo, model available from 1987 to 1995.
It has 2.0 i.e. 113HP petrol engine produced from 1990 to 1995.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113HP manual
Mazda

11 reasons for Mazda 3 I Hatchback 2.3 156KM in comparison to Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

156 > 113 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Mazda that has by 38 % more horsepower when compared to the Fiat Tipo. Therefore the Mazda 3 I will reach higher maximum speed. Having more horsepower the Mazda 3 I Hatchback 2.3 156HP will also give noticeably more flexiblility in specific gears.
22

Width

1,755 > 1,703 mm
Width of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The Mazda 3 I Hatchback 2.3 156HP is widther by 3 percent in relation to the Fiat Tipo and is not really relevant. The medium for the „small family cars” segment equals to approximately 1,703 mm and is by 3 percent larger than the same feature of the Mazda.
19

Fuel tank

55 > 47 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Mazda which can hold 8 liters more fuel compared with the Fiat Tipo. The average fuel tank capacity in the C segment, which is represented by the Mazda 3 I Hatchback, is 52 l, whereas in lower middle segment (represented by the Fiat) it equals 52 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,641 > 2,535 mm
Mazda has 106 mm longer wheelbase when compared to the Fiat Tipo. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

2,300 > 1,995 cc
The Mazda 3 I has 15 percent larger engine capacity in comparison to the Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113HP manual. As the difference is little, the Mazda 3 I should accelerate slightly faster, if other paramerters are does not play a role.
6

Length

4,413 > 3,955 mm
The Mazda 3 I Hatchback is 458 mm longer in comparison to the Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113HP manual. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually provide more storage space. Although the Mazda 3 I Hatchback occurs to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Fiat Tipo may be more appropriate to singles as it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,513 > 1,415 mm
1

Height

1,465 > 1,428 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mazda 3 I Hatchback, which is by 3 % higher than the Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113HP manual, would be appropriate option for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Model release date

2003 > 1987
0

Front track

1,530 > 1,437 mm
0

End of model sale

2009 > 1995

Fiat

2 reasons for Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 I Hatchback 2.3 156HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

350 > 300 l
The boot of the Fiat Tipo is only 50 l bigger than the Mazda 3 I Hatchback. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk capacity.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

709 > 637 l

Cars specifications

Mazda 3 I Hatchback 2.3 156HP Fiat Tipo 2.0 i.e. 113HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2003 1987
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload - 1,649 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK