The Ford Bronco II comes with petrol which delivers by 70 more horsepower over the the engine of the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It seems to be googd car to those who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Ford Bronco II 5.8 225HP is 13 percent wider when compared to the Mercury Mariner I. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Ford which can comprise 32 l more fuel in relation to the Mercury. The average fuel tank size in the full-size SUV class, which is represented by the Ford, amounts to 84 liters, whereas in full-size SUV class (represented by the Mercury Mariner I) it is 84 liters.
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Ford Bronco II has 1 % longer wheelbase distance than Mercury Mariner I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Ford should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Ford Bronco II is 8 % longer when compared to the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually provide more storage space. While the Ford Bronco II 5.8 225HP occurs to be better for families or those who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 187 mm to the advantage of the Ford Bronco II is little and should not be really noticeable.