The horsepower is a feature that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Volkswagen Touran II 1.6 TDI 105HP manual that has by 5 horsepower more in comparison to the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 100HP manual, which makes this car somewhat quicker. Due to more horsepower the Volkswagen Touran II should also provide slightly more efficiency in specific speeds.
The Volkswagen Touran II 1.6 TDI 105HP manual burns up 0.1 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 100HP manual. The Volkswagen Touran II, which is palced in „minivan” class uses by 1.4 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6.5 l.
The Volkswagen Touran II has 80 Nm more torque in
comparison to the Ford. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Volkswagen will be seeding up perceptibly faster.
The Volkswagen Touran II 1.6 TDI 105HP manual burns up 0.5 l less fuel in the city than the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 100HP manual. The difference at the level of 0.5 l is quite significant in everyday using car. Additionally, during long period of time it may generate huge savings. Moreover keep in mind that estimated results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably raised if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Ford C-MAX II Grand is relatively slower compared to the Volkswagen Touran II 1.6 TDI 105HP manual. The
difference in the amount of
0.8 s is
is slightly to the Volkswagen Touran II advantage, however, it should
not be strongly taken by you into
account for choosing
one of these two
With more boot size the Volkswagen Touran II will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull vehicle than the Ford C-MAX II Grand. If the capacity of the trunk is what does appeal to you, the Volkswagen Touran II will be better to choose as it is about 48 % more spacious than the boot of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 100HP manual.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The top speed possible to be reached by the Volkswagen Touran II is greater in relation to of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 100HP manual by 6, which allows the Volkswagen Touran II to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 6 % is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Volkswagen Touran II which is able to take by 1 l more diesel in relation to the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 100HP manual.
Trunk length with seats up
The engine cubic capacity of the Volkswagen is by 598 cc bigger in comparison to the Ford C-MAX II Grand. As a result the Ford C-MAX II Grand will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Volkswagen Touran II will be of better performance, running more smoothly and more durable.