The fuel economy is considerably to Ford C-MAX II Grand's advantage. This car uses 26 % less gasoline in the mixed cycle in relation to the Kia Soul II. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the minivan segment, in which the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual is classified, equals to 6.5 l whereas the Ford consumes by 20 % less amount of fuel than the average.
Maximum torque of the Ford C-MAX II is 8 Nm bigger than the Kia Soul II. As a result, the Ford C-MAX II will accelerate slightly swifter and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual will use less fuel for every 100 km.
The Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual consumes 1.9 l of gasoline fewer while driving inside city in comparison to the Kia. The Ford C-MAX II, which comes from minivan class, burns up 1.6 l fewer petrol, which constitutes by 19 percent better result in comparison to the average in the same segment. The difference in fuel economy between compared vehicles is quite big, so remember that in order to the the comparison have a sense, you should check vehicles of similar parameters.
With more luggage capacity the Ford C-MAX II will have much more room for loading things and be more functional car than the Kia Soul II 1.6 GDI 132HP manual. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Ford C-MAX II will be better to choose as it is around 117 l more spacious than the boot of its rival.
Trunk capacity with seats down
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual. The engine of the Kia Soul II achieves its full efficiency at 4,845 revolutions per minute which is by 3,445 revolutions per minute lower than the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual.
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual is 28 mm wider in relation to the Kia Soul II 1.6 GDI 132HP manual. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Ford C-MAX II that is able to hold by 6 l more fuel compared with the Kia Soul II.
Maximum load capacity
The Ford C-MAX II Grand is 380 mm longer than the Kia Soul II 1.6 GDI 132HP manual. Long vehicles more of passenger space and also provide more storage space. Although the Ford C-MAX II occurs to be better pick for families or those who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Kia Soul II 1.6 GDI 132HP manual may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 6 percent in favor of the Ford C-MAX II is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.