The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Ford C-MAX II that has by 9 percent horsepower more when compared to the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual, which makes this car somewhat quicker. With more horsepower the Ford will also give somewhat better flexiblility in specific gears.
The fuel economy is considerably to Ford C-MAX II's advantage. This automobile burns 26 % fewer gasoline in the mixed cycle when compared with the Mazda. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the minivan class, in which the Ford C-MAX II is classified, equals to 6.5 l while the Ford C-MAX II needs by 20 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
Maximum torque of the Ford C-MAX II is 6 newton meters greater than the Mazda. For this reason, the Ford will accelerate a little bit faster and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Ford will use on average less fuel for every 100 km.
The Ford C-MAX II Grand consumes 2.5 l less petrol in the city when compared to the Mazda. The difference at the level of 28 % is quite noticeable in daily usage of the automobile. However, in a long term it will give you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how dynamic you drive
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Mazda 5 II accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in relation to the Ford. The
difference in the amount of
0.6 s is
quite low and for that
reason it should
not be strongly taken by you into
as important when buying one of these two
The trunk of the Ford C-MAX II is 314 l bigger than the Mazda 5 II. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford C-MAX II will be a way more functional. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can load.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Ford C-MAX II is higher as compared to this of the Mazda which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 3 km/h is small and is imperceptible in daily use.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual. The engine of the Mazda reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 65 % worst result than the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual.
Maximum load capacity
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual, which is by 70 millimeters higher than the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual, is better choice for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.