Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual vs Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual

Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Ford C-MAX II Grand, model available from 2010.
It has 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Mazda 5 II, model available from 2010.
It has 1.8 MZR 115HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual
Ford

17 reasons for Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125KM manual in comparison to Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

125 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Ford C-MAX II that has by 9 percent horsepower more when compared to the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual, which makes this car somewhat quicker. With more horsepower the Ford will also give somewhat better flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

5.2 > 7 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Ford C-MAX II's advantage. This automobile burns 26 % fewer gasoline in the mixed cycle when compared with the Mazda. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the minivan class, in which the Ford C-MAX II is classified, equals to 6.5 l while the Ford C-MAX II needs by 20 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

170 > 164 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford C-MAX II is 6 newton meters greater than the Mazda. For this reason, the Ford will accelerate a little bit faster and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Ford will use on average less fuel for every 100 km.
56

Urban consumption

6.6 > 9.1 l
The Ford C-MAX II Grand consumes 2.5 l less petrol in the city when compared to the Mazda. The difference at the level of 28 % is quite noticeable in daily usage of the automobile. However, in a long term it will give you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how dynamic you drive
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.2 > 12.8 s
The Mazda 5 II accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in relation to the Ford. The difference in the amount of 0.6 s is quite low and for that reason it should not be strongly taken by you into as important when buying one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

471 > 157 l
The trunk of the Ford C-MAX II is 314 l bigger than the Mazda 5 II. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford C-MAX II will be a way more functional. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can load.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,707 > 779 l
33

Top speed

185 > 182 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Ford C-MAX II is higher as compared to this of the Mazda which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 3 km/h is small and is imperceptible in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,400 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual. The engine of the Mazda reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 65 % worst result than the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 6 l
19

Range

1,154 > 833 km
12

Urban range

938 > 645 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,304 > 1,000 km
8

Maximum load capacity

657 > 615 kg
1

Height

1,684 > 1,614 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual, which is by 70 millimeters higher than the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual, is better choice for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Payload

2,146 > 2,086 kg
0

Curb weight

1,494 > 1,465 kg

Mazda

7 reasons for Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115KM manual in comparison to Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,988 > 1,826 mm
Width of a car affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The Mazda 5 II is widther by 162 millimeters in comparison to the Ford C-MAX II Grand and is not really relevant. The medium for the „minivan” segment is approximately 1,785 millimeters and is by 203 mm larger than the same attribute of the Mazda 5 II.
19

Fuel tank

60 > 59 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual that can hold 2 percent more fuel in relation to the Ford C-MAX II. The medium fuel container capacity in the minivan class, which is represented by the Mazda, is 57 l, whereas in minivan class (represented by the Ford) it is 57 liters.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,000 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Mazda 5 II is by 80 % larger in relation to the Ford C-MAX II. As a result the Ford C-MAX II will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mazda 5 II will be of better performance, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,585 > 4,520 mm
The Mazda is 65 mm longer when compared to the Ford C-MAX II Grand. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Mazda very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mazda 5 II will be better driven but the Ford C-MAX II Grand will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 6

Cars specifications

Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual Mazda 5 II 1.8 MZR 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 898 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class minivan minivan
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK