The horsepower of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual is 9 percent bigger when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Because the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
The Ford consumes 7 percent less fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Nissan. The Ford, being classified in „minivan” segment burns up by 1.3 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6.5 l.
The Ford consumes 4 percent fewer in the urban cycle than the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not very appreciable in everyday use of the car nonetheless within a year it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
If you are looking for a vehicles for long journeys, which could carry more things in the boot , take the Ford. The Nissan has by 8 % less capable luggage compartment in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II so you would be able to put in the trunk one small parcel less. Examining the trunk pay attention to its width length and height which have substantial impact on loading possibility .
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Ford C-MAX II is higher as compared to this of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 2 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is good to see a torque graph.
Width of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Ford C-MAX II Grand is larger only by 1 percent compared with the Nissan Qashqai II and is not really important. The medium for the „minivan” segment amounts to approximately 1,785 millimeters and is by 41 mm smaller than the same feature of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual.
The Nissan loses with the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual in the field of fuel tank size. The Ford is able to carry by 9 % more fuel than the Nissan.
Maximum load capacity
The Ford C-MAX II is 3 percent longer in comparison to the Nissan. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Ford C-MAX II very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Ford will be better driven ,however, the Nissan will be a little easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars of 6 % in favor of the Ford is not big and should not be really noticeable.