Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

Ford C-MAX II Grand, model available from 2010.
It has 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Ford

19 reasons for Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

125 > 115 hp
The horsepower of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual is 9 percent bigger when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Because the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
112

Average consumption

5.2 > 5.6 l
The Ford consumes 7 percent less fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Nissan. The Ford, being classified in „minivan” segment burns up by 1.3 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.6 > 6.9 l
The Ford consumes 4 percent fewer in the urban cycle than the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not very appreciable in everyday use of the car nonetheless within a year it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
38

Trunk capacity

471 > 438 l
If you are looking for a vehicles for long journeys, which could carry more things in the boot , take the Ford. The Nissan has by 8 % less capable luggage compartment in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II so you would be able to put in the trunk one small parcel less. Examining the trunk pay attention to its width length and height which have substantial impact on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

185 > 183 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Ford C-MAX II is higher as compared to this of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 2 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,400 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is good to see a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 4.7 l
22

Width

1,826 > 1,800 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Ford C-MAX II Grand is larger only by 1 percent compared with the Nissan Qashqai II and is not really important. The medium for the „minivan” segment amounts to approximately 1,785 millimeters and is by 41 mm smaller than the same feature of the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual.
19

Range

1,154 > 982 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 54 l
The Nissan loses with the Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual in the field of fuel tank size. The Ford is able to carry by 9 % more fuel than the Nissan.
12

Urban range

938 > 797 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,304 > 1,122 km
8

Maximum load capacity

657 > 542 kg
6

Length

4,520 > 4,380 mm
The Ford C-MAX II is 3 percent longer in comparison to the Nissan. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Ford C-MAX II very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Ford will be better driven ,however, the Nissan will be a little easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,684 > 1,590 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars of 6 % in favor of the Ford is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Number of seats

6 > 5
0

Payload

2,146 > 1,860 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

746 > 679 kg
0

Curb weight

1,494 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

7 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

190 > 170 Nm
The Nissan Qashqai II has 12 % more torque in comparison to the Ford C-MAX II Grand. Even though a large number of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it describes the best how a car is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is not really big and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.3 > 12.2 s
A little difference at the level of 0.9 s shows that the Ford is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „minivan segment, being represented by the Ford, the average acceleration is 11.7 s and is by 5 percent higher than this of Ford vehicle.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,198 > 1,000 cc
The Nissan Qashqai II has 20 percent larger engine size than the Ford C-MAX II. Because the difference is not big, the Nissan Qashqai II should accelerate only slightly faster, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,199 > 898 kg
1

Model release date

2014 > 2010
Because of the fact that the Ford C-MAX II's production started only 4 years before the Nissan, the gap between technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really big, however, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual may have slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Ford C-MAX II Grand 1.0 EcoBoost 125HP manual Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 898 kg 1,199 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class minivan compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK