Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 vs Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Luftfahrrad Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

7 reasons for

Honda CR-V III SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Ford Ecosport II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
Honda

7 reasons for Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 125 hp
The horsepower of the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 is 20 percent grater in relation to the Ford Ecosport II. Because the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.2 > 12.7 s
The Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 10.2 s, which is 2.5 s than the Ford. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
33

Top speed

190 > 180 km/h
The top speed of the Honda CR-V III is higher in comparison to this of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 6 % is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
15

Wheelbase

2,615 > 2,521 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Honda CR-V III has 94 mm longer wheelbase distance when compared to Ford Ecosport II. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Honda should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,000 cc
The engine capacity of the Honda CR-V III is by 998 cc larger in comparison to the Ford Ecosport II. In a consequence the Ford will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Honda will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,530 > 4,244 mm
The Honda is 7 % longer than the Ford Ecosport II. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Honda very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 will be better driven but the Ford Ecosport II will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .

Ford

5 reasons for Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125KM manual in comparison to Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 8.3 l
The Ford Ecosport II consumes 36 % fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle than the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 3 l will be quite perceptible in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 10.4 l
The Ford Ecosport II uses of 35 percent petrol less in city traffic in relation to the Honda. The Ford Ecosport II, as a representative of compact SUV class, burns up 2.8 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l/100Km.
22

Width

2,057 > 1,822 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford is 235 mm wider when compared to the Honda CR-V III SUV. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2006
Production of the older car commenced 7 years prior to Honda hence it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle features not so advanced parts .
1

Height

1,696 > 1,682 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Ford, which is by 1 percent higher than the Honda CR-V III, is appropriate pick for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Cars specifications

Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,055 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK