The Ford Ecosport II consumes 36 % fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle than the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 3 l will be quite perceptible in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
The Ford Ecosport II uses of 35 percent petrol less in city traffic in relation to the Honda. The Ford Ecosport II, as a representative of compact SUV class, burns up 2.8 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l/100Km.
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford is 235 mm wider when compared to the Honda CR-V III SUV. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
Model release date
Production of the older car commenced 7 years prior to Honda hence it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle features not so advanced parts .
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Ford, which is by 1 percent higher than the Honda CR-V III, is appropriate pick for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.