Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual vs Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Robert Basic Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic

10 reasons for

Ford Ecosport II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Kia Retona, model available from 1997 to 2003.
It has 2.0 i 16V 128HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4
Ford

10 reasons for Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125KM manual in comparison to Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 10.8 l
The Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual uses 51 % fewer petrol in the combined cycle compared to the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4. The difference in the amount of 5.5 l is quite significant and obviously buying the Ford will result in saving a considerable amount of money. Additionally, fuel efficiency helps reduce the amount of pollution.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 12.8 l
The Ford consumes 47 % of gasoline less in the city than the Kia. The Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual, which comes from small off-road 4x4 class, consumes 2.8 l less gasoline, which is by 29 percent lower fuel consumption in comparison to the average in the same class. The difference in fuel consumption between these two cars is quite big, so remember that so as to the comparison was adequate, you should select vehicles of similar parameters.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.7 > 15 s
A little difference that amounts to 2.3 s shows that the Kia Retona is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „mini 4x4 class, being represented by the Kia Retona, the average acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 4.1 s higher than this of Kia vehicle.
33

Top speed

180 > 160 km/h
The top velocity of the Ford Ecosport II is higher in comparison to this of the Kia which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 20 kilometers per hour is small and is imperceptible in everyday use.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 9.3 l
22

Width

2,057 > 1,749 mm
Width of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Ford Ecosport II is larger only by 18 percent than the Kia Retona and is not really relevant. The average for the „small off-road 4x4” class equals to 1,797 mm and is by 14 % larger than the same attribute of the Ford Ecosport II.
15

Wheelbase

2,521 > 2,359 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Ford Ecosport II has 7 % longer wheelbase distance in relation to Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Ford should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,244 > 4,000 mm
The Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual is 6 % longer when compared to the Kia Retona. Long cars have roomy cabin and also provide more storage space. While the Ford Ecosport II occurs to be better choice for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Kia Retona may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It is beyond the question that the five-door Ford is more convenient and if you regularly carry more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Kia Retona generally look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Kia may be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2013 > 1997

Kia

4 reasons for Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

128 > 125 hp
The horsepower of the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 is 3 horsepowers bigger in relation to the Ford. While the difference is little this should not affect the car performance extensively.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,000 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Kia is by 100 percent bigger in relation to the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. As a result the Ford Ecosport II will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Kia Retona will be of better performance, running more smoothly and more durable.
1

Height

1,834 > 1,696 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Kia, which is by 138 mm higher than the Ford Ecosport II, would be better pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Cars specifications

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 1997
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,824 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK